From: John Foliot [mailto:john.foliot@deque.com] Sent: Monday, June 27, 2016 2:43 PM What do *you* think? [Jason] I would like to read the proposed success criterion before deciding. Note that the concept of a user agent (Guideline 4.1) is defined. See User Agent Accessibility Guidelines 1.0: “In this document, the term "user agent" is used in two ways: list of 2 items nesting level 1 1. The software and documentation components that together, conform to the requirements of this document. This is the most common use of the term in this document and is the usage in the checkpoints. 2. Any software that retrieves and renders Web content for users. This may include Web browsers, media players, plug-ins , and other programs — including assistive technologies — that help in retrieving and rendering Web content.” https://www.w3.org/TR/UAAG10/glossary.html#terms Thus, to fit under Principle 4, the issue must relate to compatibility with user agents as so defined. ________________________________ This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited. Thank you for your compliance. ________________________________
Received on Monday, 27 June 2016 18:56:24 UTC