- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 01:10:03 +0100
- To: "White, Jason J" <jjwhite@ets.org>, "w3c-wai-gl@w3.org" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Cc: "public-mobile-a11y-tf@w3.org" <public-mobile-a11y-tf@w3.org>
On 27/06/2016 00:43, White, Jason J wrote: > [Jason] I agree. However, there's further scope for promoting layout > which is responsive to the dimensions of the viewport, and we should > address it with success criteria to the extent that it serves > accessibility needs. "Don't require users with low vision to scroll > horizontally in order to read text" is a theme that emerges > repeatedly, and with justification. I agree as well. Of course my example wasn't exhaustive. Despite your use of "However..." I think we're in agreement then about the need to cover that particular ground (having things that adapt to different viewport sizes, orientations, etc). The original question is still if these SCs are best suited under Principle 1 or under a modified Principle 4 that expands the meaning of "robust" to not be purely about machine-readable/"mechanical" robustness but to cover softer sides of "robust" to also mean "adaptable", or if these concepts are a good fit under existing Guideline 1.3 Adaptable. Tending more towards the latter now (which may make my original question moot). P -- Patrick H. Lauke www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
Received on Monday, 27 June 2016 00:10:27 UTC