From: Andrew Kirkpatrick [mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com] Jason, Can you show me where the 8 of 10 is documented as official policy of the group for the 2.0 document? I can’t remember, but others might. The acceptance requirements for success criteria were agreed upon, and high inter-rater reliability was fundamental to them. I’m not sure where “8 out of 10” comes from and I don’t remember those number specifically. More important than any numbers is the idea that in order to be accepted into the specification, a success criterion must have “high inter-rater reliability”, in the best informed judgment of the working group. I’m less concerned about any numerical values here. ________________________________ This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited. Thank you for your compliance. ________________________________
Received on Thursday, 2 June 2016 15:48:00 UTC