From: Andrew Kirkpatrick [mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com] Sent: Thursday, June 2, 2016 11:32 AM Jason, The standard for inclusion is that the working group has consensus on it. You can debate 8 of 10 or 5 of 10 or whatever, but unless the group reaches consensus it doesn’t matter. The standard for inclusion is that the working group reaches consensus regarding (1) the standard to be adopted in deciding what should be included as success criteria and (2) whether a given proposal meets this tandard. Historically, this working group has treated (1) and (2) as distinct questions. I agree with those who say that in developing version 2.1, question (1), which includes the high inter-rater reliability requirement that 8 out of 10 raters would generally apply a criterion similarly (see my earlier contribution for a more precise statement), shouldn’t be reopened. ________________________________ This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited. Thank you for your compliance. ________________________________
Received on Thursday, 2 June 2016 15:39:29 UTC