- From: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 14:32:27 +0000
- To: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <572A1296-3CEB-436B-8CD1-F0B7006DA125@adobe.com>
WCAGers - We wanted to follow up on this item. Yesterday on the call the attendees discussed this proposal and there was agreement that this is a good approach. I encourage people to review the related minutes (http://www.w3.org/2016/05/10-wai-wcag-minutes.html) - it is the first topic on the call. We are interested in the feedback and thoughts of others on this proposal. Thanks, AWK From: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com<mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com>> Date: Tuesday, May 10, 2016 at 10:52 To: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org<mailto:w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>> Subject: WCAG proposal for discussion Resent-From: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org<mailto:w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>> Resent-Date: Tuesday, May 10, 2016 at 11:10 For discussion on the call. For list participants we encourage discussion following the call (and reading the minutes). https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Main_Page/WCAG_future_proposal Thanks, AWK Andrew Kirkpatrick Group Product Manager, Accessibility and Standards Adobe akirkpat@adobe.com<mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com> http://twitter.com/awkawk
Received on Wednesday, 11 May 2016 14:51:20 UTC