- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 5 May 2016 14:50:35 +0100
- To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
On 27/04/2016 13:34, Patrick H. Lauke wrote: > https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/184 > > I'm working on the assumption here that although the glossary definition > itself is normative (so unfortunately the actual use of "14pt bold / > 18pt" has to remain), the notes are informative/non-normative and can > therefore be amended in order to clarify those measures. I've had several good comments (initially via twitter and email) on this, which led to some fixes/additions/clarifications. What are the next steps to potentially move this forward? Does it make sense as a PR, or does it need a more succint rationale/explanation? As this only touches on non-normative notes, and expands what's currently there to provide better context without changing the actual normative meaning nor the values (keeping it as "points"), I would see this as an erratum rather than anything new/for future versions. Thoughts? P -- Patrick H. Lauke www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
Received on Thursday, 5 May 2016 13:50:59 UTC