RE: Let's add an approved date field to Failures and Techniques

Yes, lots of work.

Then make sure after all the discussions and all the edits find out that after 8 years with F26 is written up as being for 1.3.3 that it  has nothing to do with 1.3.3 and has not been questioned or removed for 8 years.

Until I questioned if it applied a few weeks ago.

We need to be careful of proper placement and applicability as well.

Alan


Sent from Mail for Windows 10

From: Gregg Vanderheiden RTF
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2016 4:11 PM
To: David MacDonald
Cc: Katie Haritos-Shea; IG - WAI Interest Group List list; GLWAI Guidelines WG org; Laura Carlson; John Foliot; Andrew Kirkpatrick; Joshue O Connor; Denis Boudreau (gmail); Kevin White
Subject: Re: Let's add an approved date field to Failures and Techniques

the biggest thing holding back documenting failures — is that it is a lot of work.

1. have to explore it
2. have to find out if there are ways to succeed while doing this
3. have to qualify it properly ( If xxxxxx is used ….) 
then you have to write it up 

lot of work. 


gregg 

On Apr 29, 2016, at 1:53 PM, David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca> wrote:


I think 4 failures in 8 years is fewer than the common failures that we as a11y evaluators have seen show up on many of our reports since that time.

Received on Friday, 29 April 2016 20:31:28 UTC