Yes, lots of work.
Then make sure after all the discussions and all the edits find out that after 8 years with F26 is written up as being for 1.3.3 that it has nothing to do with 1.3.3 and has not been questioned or removed for 8 years.
Until I questioned if it applied a few weeks ago.
We need to be careful of proper placement and applicability as well.
Alan
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: Gregg Vanderheiden RTF
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2016 4:11 PM
To: David MacDonald
Cc: Katie Haritos-Shea; IG - WAI Interest Group List list; GLWAI Guidelines WG org; Laura Carlson; John Foliot; Andrew Kirkpatrick; Joshue O Connor; Denis Boudreau (gmail); Kevin White
Subject: Re: Let's add an approved date field to Failures and Techniques
the biggest thing holding back documenting failures — is that it is a lot of work.
1. have to explore it
2. have to find out if there are ways to succeed while doing this
3. have to qualify it properly ( If xxxxxx is used ….)
then you have to write it up
lot of work.
gregg
On Apr 29, 2016, at 1:53 PM, David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca> wrote:
I think 4 failures in 8 years is fewer than the common failures that we as a11y evaluators have seen show up on many of our reports since that time.