- From: <josh@interaccess.ie>
- Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 14:05:28 +0000
- To: "John Foliot" <john.foliot@deque.com>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Cc: "'WCAG Editors'" <team-wcag-editors@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <emf1d27c57-ebb1-41fd-ad88-a9b3951b78f8@josh_machine>
Fantastic work John (and Jeanne and all involved) - if you are on the call today it would be great to share some of your insights. Appreciated :-) Josh ------ Original Message ------ From: "John Foliot" <john.foliot@deque.com> To: "WCAG" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> Cc: "'WCAG Editors'" <team-wcag-editors@w3.org> Sent: 26/04/2016 14:58:52 Subject: Comments on WCAG.Next Models >Dear Working Group, Chairs, > > > >As previously discussed, public feedback was solicited in early April >on how to proceed with WCAG.next, the extension(s) to WCAG 2.0. In >total, we received 66 emails from 27 people on this topic. > > > >Jeanne Spellman has consolidated all of that feedback into one page >(here: https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Comments_on_WCAG.Next_Models) for >this Working Group to contemplate. > > > >While feedback is still welcome, Jeanne and I believe that we have >gathered enough comments and discussion to bring this forward to the >larger group at this time, and equally that we observed a coalescence >around the proposed 2.2 model “WCAG 2.x by date across Task Forces as >work is ready”, although it is, at this time, the prerogative of the >Working Group to still entertain some of the other possible models. > > > >Subsequently, we are considering this deliverable complete, and we look >forward to the discussion and decision that the WCAG WG finally makes. > > > >Sincerely > > > >JF > >-- > >John Foliot > >Principal Accessibility Strategist > >Austin, TX > > > >Deque Systems Inc. >2121 Cooperative Way, Suite 210, >Herndon, VA 20171-5344 > >Office: 703-225-0380 > >john.foliot@deque.com > > > >Advancing the mission of digital accessibility and inclusion > > >
Received on Tuesday, 26 April 2016 15:30:20 UTC