Re: CfC: Addition to WCAG 2.0 errata

+1 in support
On Apr 19, 2016 6:08 PM, "Wayne Dick" <wayneedick@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1
>
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 2:17 PM, John Foliot <john.foliot@deque.com>
> wrote:
>
>> +1 I support this CfC
>>
>> JF
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 10:20 AM, Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> CALL FOR CONSENSUS – ends Thursday April 21 at 11:30am Boston time.
>>>
>>> The Working Group is chartered to publish an edited version of the WCAG
>>> 2.0 document that incorporates editorial errata.  An editorial issue that
>>> exists on the current list is:
>>>
>>> Success Criterion 1.4.3
>>> <http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-WCAG20-20081211/#visual-audio-contrast-contrast> point
>>> "Logotypes" states "Text that is part of a logo or brand name has no
>>> minimum contrast requirement." The word "minimum", not used in the other
>>> points, implies a difference in meaning that is not intended. For clarity
>>> and consistency, remove the word "minimum" from this point.
>>>
>>> We received a comment that this should apply to SC 1.4.6 as well since
>>> the language is identical and the working group discussed this on the call
>>> and in a survey (
>>> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/NewWCAGEditRec/results#xq7) and
>>> agreed to add this as a new errata.
>>>
>>> If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have
>>> not been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not
>>> being able to live with” this position, please let the group know before
>>> the CfC deadline.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> AWK
>>>
>>> Andrew Kirkpatrick
>>> Group Product Manager, Accessibility and Standards
>>> Adobe
>>>
>>> akirkpat@adobe.com
>>> http://twitter.com/awkawk
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> John Foliot
>> Principal Accessibility Consultant
>> Deque Systems Inc.
>> john.foliot@deque.com
>>
>> Advancing the mission of digital accessibility and inclusion
>>
>
>