Re: CfC: Addition to WCAG 2.0 errata

+1 I support this CfC

JF

On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 10:20 AM, Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>
wrote:

> CALL FOR CONSENSUS – ends Thursday April 21 at 11:30am Boston time.
>
> The Working Group is chartered to publish an edited version of the WCAG
> 2.0 document that incorporates editorial errata.  An editorial issue that
> exists on the current list is:
>
> Success Criterion 1.4.3
> <http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-WCAG20-20081211/#visual-audio-contrast-contrast> point
> "Logotypes" states "Text that is part of a logo or brand name has no
> minimum contrast requirement." The word "minimum", not used in the other
> points, implies a difference in meaning that is not intended. For clarity
> and consistency, remove the word "minimum" from this point.
>
> We received a comment that this should apply to SC 1.4.6 as well since the
> language is identical and the working group discussed this on the call and
> in a survey (
> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/NewWCAGEditRec/results#xq7) and
> agreed to add this as a new errata.
>
> If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not
> been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not
> being able to live with” this position, please let the group know before
> the CfC deadline.
>
> Thanks,
> AWK
>
> Andrew Kirkpatrick
> Group Product Manager, Accessibility and Standards
> Adobe
>
> akirkpat@adobe.com
> http://twitter.com/awkawk
>



-- 
John Foliot
Principal Accessibility Consultant
Deque Systems Inc.
john.foliot@deque.com

Advancing the mission of digital accessibility and inclusion