- From: Kathy Wahlbin <kathy@interactiveaccessibility.com>
- Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2016 12:23:06 +0000
- To: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <AA2ADA4972B28E44BEA975C2E84D405945DEAA44@ORD2MBX02E.mex05.mlsrvr.com>
+1 Kathy CEO & Founder Interactive Accessibility T (978) 443-0798 F (978) 560-1251 C (978) 760-0682 E kathyw@ia11y.com<mailto:kathyw@ia11y.com> www.InteractiveAccessibility.com<http://www.interactiveaccessibility.com/> NOTICE: This communication may contain privileged or other confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please reply to the sender indicating that fact and delete the copy you received. Thank you. From: Andrew Kirkpatrick [mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 5, 2016 1:16 PM To: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> Subject: CfC: Issue 171 Importance: High CALL FOR CONSENSUS – ends Thursday April 7 at 1:30pm Boston time. GitHub issue 171 related to the need for web pages to use Landmarks to conform to SC 1.3.1 has a proposed response as a result of a survey and discussion on the working group call (https://www.w3.org/2016/04/05-wai-wcag-minutes.html#item05). Proposed response: https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/171#issuecomment-205901598 “The Working Group agrees that Landmarks are not required to meet SC 1.3.1 for any page with head/foot/navigation areas as there are other ways to indicate a page's structure." If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not being able to live with” this position, please let the group know before the CfC deadline. Thanks, AWK Andrew Kirkpatrick Group Product Manager, Accessibility Adobe akirkpat@adobe.com<mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com> http://twitter.com/awkawk http://blogs.adobe.com/accessibility
Received on Wednesday, 6 April 2016 12:23:31 UTC