Re: Correction: 1.3.3 question for shapes/icons alone that are used everywhere now but were not back in 2008

On 04/04/2016 20:51, ALAN SMITH wrote:
> My bad, 1.3.3 as it deals with shapes.

Doing a formal reading of the wording of 1.3.3, I'd say your examples 
would also likely fail 1.3.3 (though I'll admit to not having bothered 
in the past to mark those situations as failures of 1.3.3 as they're 
usually already covered by 1.1.1, 3.3.2 and 4.1.2), and instead reserve 
1.3.3 for more general cases of shapes (not relating to controls or 
icons) used to convey meaning (e.g. a series of <div>s with lots of CSS 
styling to make up a sort of graph/visualisation).

P
-- 
Patrick H. Lauke

www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke
http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com
twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke

Received on Monday, 4 April 2016 19:58:02 UTC