- From: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>
- Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2016 20:30:39 +0000
- To: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <22D134D8-C7E3-48CA-BE40-1652427FB342@adobe.com>
Jon raised a question in response to a tweet from Paul Adam and we would like to get the group’s opinions. The issue is #171 (https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/171) and speaks to the need to follow techniques such as ARIA11 (https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20-TECHS/ARIA11.html) to mark regions of a page. The discussion so far is that authors might accomplish this with HTML5 elements (e.g. Header, footer, etc) or using ARIA landmark roles (e.g. Navigation, contentinfo, main). SC 1.3.1 reads: Info and Relationships: Information, structure, and relationships conveyed through presentation can be programmatically determined or are available in text. What do people think? For a site like http://google.com – does this page fail 1.3.1 because it doesn’t mark the header and footer areas? Thanks, AWK Andrew Kirkpatrick Group Product Manager, Accessibility Adobe akirkpat@adobe.com http://twitter.com/awkawk http://blogs.adobe.com/accessibility
Received on Friday, 1 April 2016 20:31:10 UTC