- From: Mike Elledge <melledge@yahoo.com>
- Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 17:37:58 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>, "jon.avila@ssbbartgroup.com" <jon.avila@ssbbartgroup.com>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <447472977.790766.1450460278558.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
Hi Andrew, all-- It seems that deprecation in HTML5 is straightforward and means it shouldn't be used, even if it is supported by AT. Maybe I don't understand the distinction between it being an HTML5 vs. a WCAG issue, though... Mike On Friday, December 18, 2015 12:27 PM, Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com> wrote: It’s a good point Jon. I tried an HTML5 file with td’s with scope (http://awkawk.github.io/table_td_scope_5.html) and found that at least on OSX that the scope attribute is honored. I’m not sure how other combinations deal with this… Thanks,AWK Andrew KirkpatrickGroup Product Manager, AccessibilityAdobe akirkpat@adobe.comhttp://twitter.com/awkawkhttp://blogs.adobe.com/accessibility From: Jonathan Avila <jon.avila@ssbbartgroup.com> Date: Friday, December 18, 2015 at 11:03 To: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> Subject: RE: Should techniques move to HTML5? #yiv1643967315 #yiv1643967315 -- _filtered #yiv1643967315 {font-family:Wingdings;panose-1:5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0;} _filtered #yiv1643967315 {font-family:Wingdings;panose-1:5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0;} _filtered #yiv1643967315 {font-family:Calibri;panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;} _filtered #yiv1643967315 {font-family:Tahoma;panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}#yiv1643967315 #yiv1643967315 p.yiv1643967315MsoNormal, #yiv1643967315 li.yiv1643967315MsoNormal, #yiv1643967315 div.yiv1643967315MsoNormal {margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;font-size:12.0pt;}#yiv1643967315 a:link, #yiv1643967315 span.yiv1643967315MsoHyperlink {color:blue;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv1643967315 a:visited, #yiv1643967315 span.yiv1643967315MsoHyperlinkFollowed {color:purple;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv1643967315 p.yiv1643967315MsoListParagraph, #yiv1643967315 li.yiv1643967315MsoListParagraph, #yiv1643967315 div.yiv1643967315MsoListParagraph {margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in;margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;font-size:12.0pt;}#yiv1643967315 span.yiv1643967315EmailStyle17 {color:#44546A;}#yiv1643967315 .yiv1643967315MsoChpDefault {font-size:10.0pt;} _filtered #yiv1643967315 {margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}#yiv1643967315 div.yiv1643967315WordSection1 {}#yiv1643967315 _filtered #yiv1643967315 {} _filtered #yiv1643967315 {} _filtered #yiv1643967315 {} _filtered #yiv1643967315 {} _filtered #yiv1643967315 {} _filtered #yiv1643967315 {} _filtered #yiv1643967315 {} _filtered #yiv1643967315 {} _filtered #yiv1643967315 {} _filtered #yiv1643967315 {} _filtered #yiv1643967315 {} _filtered #yiv1643967315 {font-family:Wingdings;} _filtered #yiv1643967315 {} _filtered #yiv1643967315 {font-family:Wingdings;} _filtered #yiv1643967315 {font-family:Symbol;} _filtered #yiv1643967315 {} _filtered #yiv1643967315 {font-family:Wingdings;} _filtered #yiv1643967315 {font-family:Symbol;} _filtered #yiv1643967315 {} _filtered #yiv1643967315 {font-family:Wingdings;}#yiv1643967315 ol {margin-bottom:0in;}#yiv1643967315 ul {margin-bottom:0in;}#yiv1643967315 Ø HTML5 explicitly disallows the use of scope on TD elements. I think the first question we need to agree on is whether td with a scope in HTML5 is or is not a WCAG 2 violation. If we see it as a violation then I would propose adding in a comment that this would not be a failure under HTML 4/XHTML. Jonathan Jonathan Avila Chief Accessibility Officer SSB BART Group jon.avila@ssbbartgroup.com 703.637.8957 (o) Follow us: Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn | Blog | Newsletter From: Andrew Kirkpatrick [mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com] Sent: Friday, December 18, 2015 10:47 AM To: WCAG Subject: Should techniques move to HTML5? Hey, we received a new issue from Mark Rogers (https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/127) which notes an issue in F91. F91 includes an allowance for a table header to be identified with <td scope=“col”> but HTML5 explicitly disallows the use of scope on TD elements. We could: - Add in "(HTML4 and XHTML only)” for the line in the procedure that allows for this - Change the entire technique to HTML5 and removing the TD scope line in the procedure. - Make a new, very similar failure for HTML5 that removes the TD scope line. I’m sure that we aren’t interested in encouraging TD with scope, but as a failure we need to be careful. What do people think? Is there a downside to adapting this and other techniques to HTML5, even if it means losing some HTML4 content? Thanks, AWK Andrew Kirkpatrick Group Product Manager, Accessibility Adobe akirkpat@adobe.com http://twitter.com/awkawk http://blogs.adobe.com/accessibility
Received on Friday, 18 December 2015 17:41:13 UTC