- From: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 14:54:46 +0000
- To: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <8C1BD7A1-7DF6-4A05-9D42-C8903F93018E@adobe.com>
Found an editorial change that we could add in. In conformance requirement #5: http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/#cc5 The success criteria listed as relevant to the concept of non-interference are: 1.4.2 2.1.2 2.3.1 2.2.2 Perhaps these should be in order… Thanks, AWK Andrew Kirkpatrick Group Product Manager, Accessibility Adobe akirkpat@adobe.com http://twitter.com/awkawk http://blogs.adobe.com/accessibility From: Andrew Kirkpatrick Date: Friday, October 16, 2015 at 09:35 To: WCAG Subject: Re: Publishing an Editing Recommendation Resent-From: WCAG Resent-Date: Friday, October 16, 2015 at 09:35 Following up on this email from last week as no one has commented and want to make sure that people give it some thought… Anyone have any new editorial changes that they have identified in the WCAG 2.0 document that they can share? Thanks, AWK Andrew Kirkpatrick Group Product Manager, Accessibility Adobe akirkpat@adobe.com<mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com> http://twitter.com/awkawk http://blogs.adobe.com/accessibility From: Andrew Kirkpatrick Date: Thursday, October 8, 2015 at 11:21 To: WCAG Subject: Publishing an Editing Recommendation Resent-From: WCAG Resent-Date: Thursday, October 8, 2015 at 11:22 Working Group, One of the items that we are chartered for is the release of an edited Recommendation to address just the editorial errata – not any changes except editorial ones. We would like to ask people to submit any additional errata to the group for consideration before we start the process. Items like spelling errors, incorrect language codes on examples, and other errors that don’t affect the meaning of the normative text are good examples. You are welcome to submit any errata you find, but just be aware that only the truly editorial ones will be in the edited recommendation and the others will be recorded for future consideration. Please take a look at the WCAG 2.0 recommendation and familiarize yourself with the existing editorial errata (links below) and in the next two weeks please submit any new errata for review. WCAG 2.0: http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/ Errata: http://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG20/errata/ Thanks, AWK Andrew Kirkpatrick Group Product Manager, Accessibility Adobe akirkpat@adobe.com<mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com> http://twitter.com/awkawk http://blogs.adobe.com/accessibility
Received on Monday, 19 October 2015 14:55:18 UTC