w3c-wai-gl@w3.org from October to December 2015 by date

Tuesday, 29 December 2015

• T.V.L. Global, Not Only Logistics, Also Your Reliable Partner in China Alice

Friday, 18 December 2015

• Re: Should techniques move to HTML5? Mike Elledge
• Re: CfC: Issue 113 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Should techniques move to HTML5? Steve Faulkner
• RE: Should techniques move to HTML5? John Foliot
• Re: Should techniques move to HTML5? Steve Faulkner
• RE: Should techniques move to HTML5? Jonathan Avila
• Re: Should techniques move to HTML5? Andrew Kirkpatrick
• RE: Should techniques move to HTML5? John Foliot
• Re: Should techniques move to HTML5? David MacDonald
• Re: Should techniques move to HTML5? Mike Elledge
• RE: Should techniques move to HTML5? Jonathan Avila
• RE: Should techniques move to HTML5? John Foliot
• Re: Should techniques move to HTML5? Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Should techniques move to HTML5? Mike Elledge
• RE: Should techniques move to HTML5? John Foliot
• RE: Should techniques move to HTML5? Jonathan Avila
• Re: Should techniques move to HTML5? Steve Faulkner
• Re: Should techniques move to HTML5? Katie Haritos-Shea
• Should techniques move to HTML5? Andrew Kirkpatrick

Thursday, 17 December 2015

• Re: HTML editing TF josh@interaccess.ie
• HTML editing TF Jonathan Avila
• Re: Error Handling Best Practice? Michiel Bijl
• Re: Error Handling Best Practice? Alistair Garrison
• Re: Error Handling Best Practice? Michiel Bijl
• Re: Error Handling Best Practice? Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: Error Handling Best Practice? Michiel Bijl
• Fwd: Error Handling Best Practice? Alistair Garrison

Wednesday, 16 December 2015

• RE: Issue 113 John Foliot
• Re: The examples for aria-expanded differ in the Wiki.... Andrew Kirkpatrick
• RE: Issue 113 Kathy Wahlbin
• RE: CfC: Minor change to Image Tutorial requested by EOWG Kathy Wahlbin
• Fwd: The examples for aria-expanded differ in the Wiki.... Coralie Mercier
• Re: CfC: Minor change to Image Tutorial requested by EOWG David MacDonald
• Re: CfC: Minor change to Image Tutorial requested by EOWG Andrew Kirkpatrick
• CfC: Issue 113 Andrew Kirkpatrick

Tuesday, 15 December 2015

• Re: CfC: Issue 122 Sailesh Panchang
• RE: reCAPTCHA Accessibility reVISTED EA Draffan
• Meeting Minutes December 15, 2015 Laura Carlson
• Re: CfC: Issue 122 Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: CfC: Issue 122 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• reCAPTCHA Accessibility reVISTED Laura Carlson
• Re: WCAG Agenda December 15th 2015 Kenny Zhang

Monday, 14 December 2015

• Re: CfC: Issue 122 Sailesh Panchang
• Re: CfC: Issue 122 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: CfC: Issue 122 Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: CfC: Issue 122 Sailesh Panchang
• RE: WCAG Agenda December 15th 2015 ALAN SMITH
• RE: WCAG Agenda December 15th 2015 Kathy Wahlbin
• WCAG Agenda December 15th 2015 Joshue O Connor

Saturday, 12 December 2015

• Re: CfC: Issue 122 Detlev Fischer
• Re: Issue 122 Jonathan Avila
• RE: Issue 122 Kathy Wahlbin
• Re: CfC: Issue 122 Gregg Vanderheiden RTF
• Re: CfC: Issue 122 David MacDonald
• RE: Issue 122 Rochford, John
• RE: Issue 122 EA Draffan
• Re[2]: Issue 122 josh@interaccess.ie
• Re: Issue 122 Srinivasu Chakravarthula
• Re: Issue 122 Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: Issue 122 Katie Haritos-Shea
• Re: Issue 122 Wayne Dick

Friday, 11 December 2015

• Re: CfC: Minor change to Image Tutorial requested by EOWG Wayne Dick
• Re: CfC: Issue 122 Paul Adam
• Re: CfC: Issue 122 Sailesh Panchang
• CfC: Minor change to Image Tutorial requested by EOWG Andrew Kirkpatrick
• RE: Issue 122 ALAN SMITH
• Re: CfC: Issue 122 David MacDonald
• Re: Issue 122 David MacDonald
• Re: CfC: Issue 122 Laura Carlson
• RE: Issue 122 John Foliot
• CfC: Issue 122 Andrew Kirkpatrick

Thursday, 10 December 2015

• Re: CfC on Issue 102 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: CfC: Extension Requirements Andrew Kirkpatrick

Tuesday, 8 December 2015

• RE: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 ALAN SMITH
• RE: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 Jonathan Avila
• Re: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 Gregg Vanderheiden RTF
• RE: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 Jonathan Avila
• Re: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• RE: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 John Foliot
• Re: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 Makoto UEKI - Infoaxia, Inc.
• RE: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 John Foliot
• RE: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 John Foliot
• Re: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 Makoto UEKI - Infoaxia, Inc.
• RE: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 Jonathan Avila
• Re: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 Sailesh Panchang
• RE: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 ALAN SMITH
• RE: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL
• Re[2]: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 josh@interaccess.ie
• RE: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 Jonathan Avila
• RE: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL
• Re: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 White, Jason J
• Re: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: No meeting 8 Dec 2015 Wayne Dick
• RE: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 Jonathan Avila

Monday, 7 December 2015

• RE: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 John Foliot
• Re: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 David MacDonald
• Re: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 Paul Adam
• Re: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 Steve Faulkner
• Re: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 Gregg Vanderheiden
• No meeting 8 Dec 2015 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1, F91 David MacDonald
• Re[2]: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1, F91 josh@interaccess.ie
• Re[2]: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 josh@interaccess.ie
• Re[2]: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 josh@interaccess.ie
• CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 josh@interaccess.ie
• Re: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 David MacDonald
• Re: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 David MacDonald
• Re: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1, F91 Detlev Fischer
• RE: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 Jonathan Avila
• Re: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 Sailesh Panchang
• RE: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 Jonathan Avila
• RE: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 Jonathan Avila
• Re: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 Paul Adam
• Re: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 Paul Adam
• Re: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 Sailesh Panchang

Saturday, 5 December 2015

• Re: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re[2]: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 josh@interaccess.ie
• Re: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 Detlev Fischer
• Re: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 Paul Adam

Friday, 4 December 2015

• Re: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 Paul Adam
• Re: Re[2]: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Re[2]: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Re[2]: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• CfC on Issue 102 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: CfC: Extension Requirements Andrew Kirkpatrick

Thursday, 3 December 2015

• Re: Open Issue #102 Kurt Mattes

Friday, 4 December 2015

• Re: The <pre> element Mike Elledge

Thursday, 3 December 2015

• Re: The <pre> element Jens Oliver Meiert
• Re: The <pre> element Mike Elledge
• Re: CfC: Extension Requirements Andrew Kirkpatrick
• CfC: Extension Requirements Andrew Kirkpatrick
• CfC: Extension Requirements Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Open Issue #102 Gregg Vanderheiden RTF
• RE: The <pre> element John Foliot
• RE: The <pre> element Gunderson, Jon R
• Re: The <pre> element Jonathan Avila
• Re: The <pre> element Mike Elledge
• Re: The <pre> element Steve Faulkner
• The <pre> element Mike Elledge

Tuesday, 1 December 2015

• Re: No action needed. Just discussion Jonathan Avila
• Re: Open Issue #102 Mike Elledge
• No action needed. Just discussion Wayne Dick
• Re: Open Issue #102 Gregg Vanderheiden
• Open Issue #102 Mike Elledge
• Minutes from WCAG 1st December, 2015 meeting Marc Johlic
• WCAG-ACTION-317: Send note to list on 102 https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/102 for comments and see if this can just be closed Web Content Accessibility Guidelines Working Group Issue Tracker
• WCAG-ACTION-316: Send a quick pointer to aria to take a look at this https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/113 Web Content Accessibility Guidelines Working Group Issue Tracker
• RE: WCAG Agenda 1st December, 2015 Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL
• Re: WCAG Agenda 1st December, 2015 Sarah Horton
• RE: WCAG Agenda 1st December, 2015 Kathy Wahlbin
• WCAG Agenda 1st December, 2015 josh@interaccess.ie

Wednesday, 25 November 2015

• Re[2]: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 josh@interaccess.ie
• Re: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 Andrew Kirkpatrick

Tuesday, 24 November 2015

• Re: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 Paul Adam
• Editorial changes to extensions Re: WCAG Agenda November 24th, 2015 Michael Cooper
• coming... just installed new comptuer David MacDonald
• Re: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 Detlev Fischer
• RE: WCAG Agenda November 24th, 2015 Kathy Wahlbin
• Re: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 David MacDonald
• RE: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 Jonathan Avila

Monday, 23 November 2015

• Re: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 Wayne Dick
• Re: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 Laura Carlson
• Re: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 Mike Elledge
• Re: WCAG Agenda November 24th, 2015 Laura Carlson
• Meeting password for WCAG meeting in WebEx changed Michael Cooper
• Re: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 Katie Haritos-Shea
• WCAG Agenda November 24th, 2015 josh@interaccess.ie

Sunday, 22 November 2015

• Re: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 David MacDonald
• Re: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 Detlev Fischer

Saturday, 21 November 2015

• CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 Andrew Kirkpatrick

Friday, 20 November 2015

• Re: Forwarding explanation of "available in text" in SC 1.3.1 Sailesh Panchang
• Re: Forwarding explanation of "available in text" in SC 1.3.1 David MacDonald
• Re: GitHub issue on checkbox and radio button labels David MacDonald
• RE: GitHub issue on checkbox and radio button labels Jonathan Avila
• Re: GitHub issue on checkbox and radio button labels Paul Adam
• Re: GitHub issue on checkbox and radio button labels Sailesh Panchang
• RE: GitHub issue on checkbox and radio button labels John Foliot
• Re: GitHub issue on checkbox and radio button labels Paul Adam
• Re: GitHub issue on checkbox and radio button labels Paul Adam
• RE: GitHub issue on checkbox and radio button labels John Foliot
• Re: Forwarding explanation of "available in text" in SC 1.3.1 Jonathan Avila
• Re: GitHub issue on checkbox and radio button labels Jonathan Avila
• Forwarding explanation of "available in text" in SC 1.3.1 Sailesh Panchang
• Re: GitHub issue on checkbox and radio button labels Andrew Kirkpatrick
• RE: GitHub issue on checkbox and radio button labels Michael Pluke
• Re: GitHub issue on checkbox and radio button labels Gregg Vanderheiden RTF

Thursday, 19 November 2015

• Re: GitHub issue on checkbox and radio button labels Sailesh Panchang
• RE: GitHub issue on checkbox and radio button labels Jonathan Avila
• RE: GitHub issue on checkbox and radio button labels Jonathan Avila
• Re: GitHub issue on checkbox and radio button labels Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: GitHub issue on checkbox and radio button labels Laura Carlson
• RE: GitHub issue on checkbox and radio button labels John Foliot
• Re: GitHub issue on checkbox and radio button labels Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: GitHub issue on checkbox and radio button labels Laura Carlson
• Re: GitHub issue on checkbox and radio button labels Paul Adam
• Re: GitHub issue on checkbox and radio button labels Paul Adam
• Re: GitHub issue on checkbox and radio button labels Jonathan Avila
• Re: GitHub issue on checkbox and radio button labels Detlev Fischer
• Re: GitHub issue on checkbox and radio button labels Paul Adam
• Re: GitHub issue on checkbox and radio button labels Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: GitHub issue on checkbox and radio button labels Steve Faulkner
• GitHub issue on checkbox and radio button labels Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Call for Review: How to Meet WCAG 2.0: A customizable quick reference Herin Hentry

Tuesday, 17 November 2015

• Call for Review: How to Meet WCAG 2.0: A customizable quick reference Shawn Henry
• Re: Draft Minutes for November 17, 2015 Meeting Eric Eggert
• Draft Minutes for November 17, 2015 Meeting Mike Elledge
• Re: WCAG Agenda November 17, 2015 Moe Kraft
• Re: Introduction Laura Carlson
• Re: WCAG Agenda November 17, 2015 Kenny Zhang
• Introduction Sarah Horton
• RE: WCAG Agenda November 17, 2015 Kathy Wahlbin

Monday, 16 November 2015

• Re: CfC: Public Draft version of How to Meet WCAG resource Wayne Dick
• Re: CfC: Public Draft version of How to Meet WCAG resource Mike Elledge
• Re: CfC: Public Draft version of How to Meet WCAG resource Andrew Kirkpatrick

Friday, 13 November 2015

• WCAG Agenda November 17, 2015 Andrew Kirkpatrick

Thursday, 12 November 2015

• CfC: Public Draft version of How to Meet WCAG resource Andrew Kirkpatrick

Tuesday, 10 November 2015

• WCAG WG Draft Minutes November 10, 2015 Jonathan Avila
• Review of Open Ajax Alliance WCAG RULE Checks David MacDonald
• Re: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement David MacDonald
• Re: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: WCAG Agenda November 10, 2015 josh@interaccess.ie
• !Important: Quickef survey - Gentle reminder josh@interaccess.ie

Monday, 9 November 2015

• WCAG Agenda November 10, 2015 Andrew Kirkpatrick

Saturday, 7 November 2015

• Re: Do SCs need to be testable? Gregg Vanderheiden RTF
• RE: Do SCs need to be testable? Michael Pluke
• RE: Do SCs need to be testable? Michael Pluke

Friday, 6 November 2015

• Re: Do SCs need to be testable? Gregg Vanderheiden RTF
• Re: Do SCs need to be testable? White, Jason J
• RE: Do SCs need to be testable? Deborah Dahl
• RE: Do SCs need to be testable? Michael Pluke
• RE: Do SCs need to be testable? Rochford, John
• RE: Do SCs need to be testable? lisa.seeman
• RE: Do SCs need to be testable? Rochford, John
• RE: Meeting Minutes November 3, 2015 EA Draffan

Thursday, 5 November 2015

• Re: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement David MacDonald
• Re: Meeting Minutes November 3, 2015 David MacDonald
• RE: Do SCs need to be testable? Michael Pluke
• Re: Do SCs need to be testable? White, Jason J
• Re: Do SCs need to be testable? Mike Elledge
• Re: Do SCs need to be testable? White, Jason J
• Re: Do SCs need to be testable? Gregg Vanderheiden RTF

Wednesday, 4 November 2015

• Re: Re[2]: Do SCs need to be testable? Joshue O Connor
• Re: Re[2]: Do SCs need to be testable? Jim Allan
• QuickRef approval for public review Andrew Kirkpatrick

Tuesday, 3 November 2015

• Meeting Minutes November 3, 2015 Laura Carlson
• RE: WCAG Agenda November 3rd, 2015 Bailey, Bruce
• Re: Method for minting new Success Criteria Sailesh Panchang
• Re[2]: Do SCs need to be testable? josh@interaccess.ie
• RE: Method for minting new Success Criteria Hoffman, Allen
• Re: Method for minting new Success Criteria David MacDonald

Monday, 2 November 2015

• Re: Do SCs need to be testable? Mike Elledge
• Re: Do SCs need to be testable? Gregg Vanderheiden RTF
• Re[2]: Method for minting new Success Criteria josh@interaccess.ie
• Re: Method for minting new Success Criteria Srinivasu Chakravarthula
• RE: Method for minting new Success Criteria Hoffman, Allen
• RE: Do SCs need to be testable? Hoffman, Allen
• RE: WCAG Agenda November 3rd, 2015 EA Draffan
• Re: WCAG Agenda November 3rd, 2015 David MacDonald
• Re: WCAG Agenda November 3rd, 2015 Joshue O Connor
• Re: WCAG Agenda November 3rd, 2015 Eric Eggert

Sunday, 1 November 2015

• Re: Using more robust failures to support existing SCs Gregg Vanderheiden RTF
• WCAG Agenda November 3rd, 2015 Joshue O Connor

Saturday, 31 October 2015

• Re: Do SCs need to be testable? Gregg Vanderheiden

Friday, 30 October 2015

• Re: Method for minting new Success Criteria David MacDonald
• Re: Using more robust failures to support existing SCs David MacDonald
• Re: Method for minting new Success Criteria Wayne Dick
• Re: Using more robust failures to support existing SCs Wayne Dick
• Re: COGA SC rewrite Sailesh Panchang
• Re: Using more robust failures to support existing SCs Gregg Vanderheiden RTF
• RE: Using more robust failures to support existing SCs Jonathan Avila
• Re: Using more robust failures to support existing SCs james.nurthen@oracle.com
• Re: Using more robust failures to support existing SCs josh@interaccess.ie
• RE: COGA SC rewrite EA Draffan
• Re: COGA SC rewrite Gregg Vanderheiden

Thursday, 29 October 2015

• Re: Using more robust failures to support existing SCs Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: Do SCs need to be testable? Laura Carlson
• Using more robust failures to support existing SCs Joshue O Connor
• Do SCs need to be testable? Joshue O Connor
• Method for minting new Success Criteria Joshue O Connor
• COGA SC rewrite Joshue O Connor
• Results from a WCAG 2.0 survey from Universidad de Alcalá Jonathan Avila
• Re: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement wcan

Friday, 23 October 2015

• No WCAG meeting next week (27th Oct) josh@interaccess.ie

Thursday, 29 October 2015

• Re: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement David MacDonald
• Re: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement David MacDonald
• RE: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement Hoffman, Allen
• Re: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement Can Wang

Wednesday, 28 October 2015

• Re: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement Gregg Vanderheiden RTF
• Re: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement David MacDonald
• Re: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement lisa.seeman
• Re: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement Detlev Fischer
• Re: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement lisa.seeman
• RE: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement Jonathan Avila
• Re: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement Adam Solomon
• RE: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement lisa.seeman
• RE: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement Jonathan Avila
• Re: Script-Based Web Accessibility Proposal - Web Accessibility Actions Joshue O Connor
• Re: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement Detlev Fischer
• as a side note lisa.seeman
• Re: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement lisa.seeman

Tuesday, 27 October 2015

• Re: i guess no meeting today Joshue O Connor
• i guess no meeting today David MacDonald
• Script-Based Web Accessibility Proposal - Web Accessibility Actions Jonathan Avila
• Re: Structure vs. Value and Contradictory Criteria Gregg Vanderheiden

Monday, 26 October 2015

• Re: Structure vs. Value and Contradictory Criteria Jonathan Avila
• RE: Structure vs. Value and Contradictory Criteria Hoffman, Allen
• RE: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement Hoffman, Allen
• Re: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement lisa.seeman
• Re: 2 proposed resolutions. Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement Gregg Vanderheiden
• 2 proposed resolutions. lisa.seeman

Sunday, 25 October 2015

• RE: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement EA Draffan
• Re: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement lisa.seeman
• Re: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement lisa.seeman
• Re: Structure vs. Value and Contradictory Criteria Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement Laura Carlson

Friday, 23 October 2015

• WCAG change Cherie Ekholm
• No WCAG meeting next week (27th Oct) josh@interaccess.ie
• Re: Structure vs. Value and Contradictory Criteria Wayne Dick
• Re: Structure vs. Value and Contradictory Criteria Wayne Dick
• Re: Structure vs. Value and Contradictory Criteria Adam Solomon
• Re: Structure vs. Value and Contradictory Criteria Wayne Dick

Thursday, 22 October 2015

• Re: Structure vs. Value and Contradictory Criteria Gregg Vanderheiden
• Structure vs. Value and Contradictory Criteria Wayne Dick
• Extensions: have a 'MonoSpec' extension? Sailesh Panchang
• Re: Clarifying concept of extension Sailesh Panchang
• Re: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement Laura Carlson
• Re: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement Laura Carlson
• Re: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement Gregg Vanderheiden

Wednesday, 21 October 2015

• Re: Contrast of focused item (options) in select element Jim Allan
• Re: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement Mike Elledge
• Re: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement Laura Carlson
• Re: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement lisa.seeman
• Re[2]: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement josh@interaccess.ie
• Re: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement Laura Carlson
• Re: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement lisa.seeman
• Re: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement Laura Carlson

Tuesday, 20 October 2015

• RE: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement Hoffman, Allen
• Re: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement Wayne Dick
• RE: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement Jonathan Avila
• RE: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement Hoffman, Allen
• Re: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement Wayne Dick
• Re: Contrast of focused item (options) in select element James Nurthen
• Contrast of focused item (options) in select element Jonathan Avila
• RE: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement Jonathan Avila
• Re: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement Wayne Dick

Monday, 19 October 2015

• RE: Whta COGA is doing with personlization - was Extension conflict/compatibility requirement EA Draffan
• RE: WCAG Agenda October 21 2014 Bailey, Bruce
• Whta COGA is doing with personlization - was Extension conflict/compatibility requirement lisa.seeman
• Re: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement Laura Carlson
• Re: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement Michael Pluke
• Re: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement Srinivasu Chakravarthula
• RE: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement Jonathan Avila
• Re: Publishing an Editing Recommendation Laura Carlson
• RE: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement Michael Pluke
• RE: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement lisa.seeman
• Re: Publishing an Editing Recommendation Andrew Kirkpatrick
• RE: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement Hoffman, Allen
• Re: Extension levels Laura Carlson
• Re: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement Mike Elledge
• Re: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement Laura Carlson

Friday, 16 October 2015

• Re: Publishing an Editing Recommendation Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Extension levels Joshue O Connor
• Extension conflict/compatibility requirement Joshue O Connor
• No WCAG meeting 20th Oct 2015 Joshue O Connor

Tuesday, 13 October 2015

• Re: WCAG Agenda October 13th 2015 Srinivasu Chakravarthula
• Re: WCAG Agenda October 13th 2015 Joshue O Connor
• Re: Regrets: WCAG Agenda October 13th 2015 Moe Kraft
• Re: WCAG Agenda October 13th 2015 Marc Johlic
• Regrets: WCAG Agenda October 13th 2015 Wayne Dick
• Re: WCAG Agenda October 13th 2015 Mike Elledge
• RE: WCAG Agenda October 13th 2015 Bailey, Bruce
• RE: WCAG Agenda October 13th 2015 Kathy Wahlbin
• Re: WCAG Agenda October 13th 2015 Eric Eggert
• Re: WCAG Agenda October 13th 2015 Joshue O Connor
• RE: WCAG Agenda October 13th 2015 Jonathan Avila

Monday, 12 October 2015

• Re: 48-Hour Call for Consensus (CfC): Publish MAUR as W3C Note David MacDonald

Friday, 9 October 2015

• WCAG Agenda October 13th 2015 josh@interaccess.ie

Thursday, 8 October 2015

• Publishing an Editing Recommendation Andrew Kirkpatrick

Wednesday, 7 October 2015

• Re: WCAG MinutesOctober 6, 2015 Eric Eggert
• Re: WCAG MinutesOctober 6, 2015 Srinivasu Chakravarthula

Tuesday, 6 October 2015

• WCAG MinutesOctober 6, 2015 Wayne Dick
• Re: WCAG Agenda October 6, 2015 Srinivasu Chakravarthula
• RE: WCAG Agenda October 6, 2015 Bailey, Bruce
• Re: WCAG Agenda October 6, 2015 Kenny Zhang

Friday, 2 October 2015

• interesting Nielsen article on flat design for cognitive team David MacDonald
• WCAG Agenda October 6, 2015 Andrew Kirkpatrick

Thursday, 1 October 2015

• Re: HTML for markup and CSS for presentation: valid? Sailesh Panchang
• RE: HTML for markup and CSS for presentation: valid? Hoffman, Allen

Last message date: Tuesday, 29 December 2015 00:26:31 UTC