Re: Diagram of WCAG Extension integration into WCAG (Proposal)

Hi Detlev,

"WCAG Extension" heading  is the the label of the blob in the normative section.

But "WCAG Extensions" heading with an "s" (plural) lables the WCAG
extensions to the left over the individual extensions (Mobile,
Cognitive, Low vision).

That is a an important distinction, which perhaps needs to be
emphasized in a more obvious way.

I agree that the arrows are confusing.  Perhaps the diagram is trying
to do too many things. I wonder if it would it help simply things if
we had 2 diagrams? One for how the  normative stuff is integrated and
one for the how the techniques are integrated.

Best Regards,

Laura

On 9/24/15, Detlev Fischer <detlev.fischer@testkreis.de> wrote:
> What I currently find confusing is that "WCAG Extension" is both the label
> of the blob in the normative section BUT ALSO heads the WCAG extensions to
> the left (the boxes Mobile, Coginitve, Low vision). The meaning of the
> arrows could be that some or all of that stuff feeds into a normative
> extension or that there a relation of sorts between two separate things.
> The diagram also leaves me uncertain as to the exact status of *the*
> Extension or the *extensions* - it doesn't tell me clearly if and when I
> need to meet the Extension to claim WCAG 2.0 conformance.
>
> --
> Detlev Fischer
> testkreis c/o feld.wald.wiese
> Thedestr. 2, 22767 Hamburg
>
> Mobil +49 (0)1577 170 73 84
> Tel +49 (0)40 439 10 68-3
> Fax +49 (0)40 439 10 68-5
>
> http://www.testkreis.de
> Beratung, Tests und Schulungen für barrierefreie Websites
>
> Laura Carlson schrieb am 24.09.2015 16:33:
>
>> Hi David and all,
>>
>> I think the idea of a  flowchart to depict how separate extensions
>> become 1 unified WCAG extension is great. Reminds me of those "How a
>> bill becomes a law" diagrams.
>>
>> I gave the flowchart it's own section on the WCAG 2 Extension
>> Principles Wiki Page.
>> https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/WCAG_2_Extension_Principles
>>
>> Thanks for your hard work.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Laura
>>
>> On 9/24/15, Srinivasu Chakravarthula <srinivasu.chakravarthula@deque.com>
>> wrote:
>>> +1 Great work, David.
>>>
>>> >From the beginning at least my understanding is that TFs are subgroups
>>> of
>>> WGs.
>>> Best,
>>> Srini
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>> *Srinivasu Chakravarthula*
>>> Sr. Accessibility Consultant, *Deque* <http://deque.com>
>>> Hand phone: +91 709 380 3855
>>>
>>> Deque University <http://dequeuniversity.com> | Follow me on Twitter
>>> <http://twitter.com/CSrinivasu> | Connect on LinkedIn
>>> <http://linkedin.com/in/srinivasuc> | About Me
>>> <http://about.me/srinivasuc>
>>>
>>> Technology is a gift to everyone; let's create inclusive digital
>>> experience
>>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 2:05 PM, josh@interaccess.ie
>>> <josh@interaccess.ie>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Great stuff David! As discussed on the call yesterday - one area that
>>>> your diagram would need to address is the nexus/delta between related
>>>> techniques (as outputs from various TFs that cover users in other
>>>> groups).
>>>>
>>>> At least to indicate that in your document flow would be good as the
>>>> techniques may not always be exclusively related to the needs of each
>>>> TFs
>>>> target user group.
>>>>
>>>> I also think that the Mobile TF, Cognitive TF  and Low Vision TF work
>>>> belongs 'inside' the 'WCAG Extension' Circle, as the TFs are tasked to
>>>> do
>>>> this work, and your visual representation indicates that they may be
>>>> separate.
>>>>
>>>> Good work though :-)
>>>>
>>>> Josh
>>>>
>>>> ------ Original Message ------
>>>> From: "David MacDonald" <david100@sympatico.ca>
>>>> To: "WCAG" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
>>>> Sent: 23/09/2015 21:14:56
>>>> Subject: Diagram of WCAG Extension integration into WCAG (Proposal)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I've created a diagram of how we might integrate the extensions into a
>>>> single document.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> http://davidmacd.com/blog/WCAG-extension-proposed-integration-into-WCAG.html
>>>>
>>>> Description:
>>>> The task forces, Mobile, Cognitive, and Low Vision would develop
>>>> guidelines, success criteria and techniques separately, and then
>>>> integrate
>>>> them to resolve conflicts and overlaps and then integrate them into the
>>>> singular WCAG extension. The techniques would be collected in a non
>>>> normative document as techniques for the extension, and some of them
>>>> can
>>>> be
>>>> referenced from WCAG 2 where the techniques might apply to an existing
>>>> Success criteria.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> David MacDonald
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*
>>>>
>>>> Tel:  613.235.4902
>>>>
>>>> LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>
>>>>
>>>> www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *  Adapting the web to all users*
>>>> *            Including those with disabilities*
>>>>
>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
>>>> <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Laura L. Carlson
>>
>
>
>


-- 
Laura L. Carlson

Received on Thursday, 24 September 2015 15:52:58 UTC