- From: <josh@interaccess.ie>
- Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 08:35:39 +0000
- To: "David MacDonald" <david100@sympatico.ca>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <ema6a4fa2c-39e9-48f9-b789-378d4faf02e8@josh_machine>
Great stuff David! As discussed on the call yesterday - one area that your diagram would need to address is the nexus/delta between related techniques (as outputs from various TFs that cover users in other groups). At least to indicate that in your document flow would be good as the techniques may not always be exclusively related to the needs of each TFs target user group. I also think that the Mobile TF, Cognitive TF and Low Vision TF work belongs 'inside' the 'WCAG Extension' Circle, as the TFs are tasked to do this work, and your visual representation indicates that they may be separate. Good work though :-) Josh ------ Original Message ------ From: "David MacDonald" <david100@sympatico.ca> To: "WCAG" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> Sent: 23/09/2015 21:14:56 Subject: Diagram of WCAG Extension integration into WCAG (Proposal) >I've created a diagram of how we might integrate the extensions into a >single document. > >http://davidmacd.com/blog/WCAG-extension-proposed-integration-into-WCAG.html > >Description: >The task forces, Mobile, Cognitive, and Low Vision would develop >guidelines, success criteria and techniques separately, and then >integrate them to resolve conflicts and overlaps and then integrate >them into the singular WCAG extension. The techniques would be >collected in a non normative document as techniques for the extension, >and some of them can be referenced from WCAG 2 where the techniques >might apply to an existing Success criteria. > >Cheers, > >David MacDonald > > > >CanAdaptSolutions Inc. > >Tel: 613.235.4902 > >LinkedIn > >www.Can-Adapt.com > > > > Adapting the web to all users > > Including those with disabilities > >If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy > >
Received on Thursday, 24 September 2015 08:35:52 UTC