- From: Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL <ryladog@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 12:08:47 -0400
- To: "'Laura Carlson'" <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>, "'Joshue O Connor'" <josh@interaccess.ie>, "'WCAG'" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
I am not sure cancel is the right term. Override seems more appropriate to me. * katie * Katie Haritos-Shea Senior Accessibility SME (WCAG/Section 508/ADA/AODA) Cell: 703-371-5545 | ryladog@gmail.com | Oakton, VA | LinkedIn Profile | Office: 703-371-5545 -----Original Message----- From: Laura Carlson [mailto:laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 12:05 PM To: Joshue O Connor; WCAG Subject: Re: WCAG extension Hi again, On 7/23/15, Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com> wrote: > Extensions MUST NOT override WCAG 2.0 conformance requirements and > success criterion. (Principle to answer question 2) A better word for "override" may be "cancel". So that one could read, "Extensions MUST NOT cancel WCAG 2.0 conformance requirements and success criterion." Kindest Regards, Laura -- Laura L. Carlson
Received on Thursday, 23 July 2015 16:09:22 UTC