- From: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
- Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 17:49:32 -0400
- To: Sailesh Panchang <spanchang02@yahoo.com>
- CC: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <BLU436-SMTP236155D17E9AA1B11D0AF87FE840@phx.gbl>
I think it comes down to accessibility support. Last time I checked the figcaption didn't work with any screen reader. Cheers, David MacDonald *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.* Tel: 613.235.4902 LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100> www.Can-Adapt.com * Adapting the web to all users* * Including those with disabilities* If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html> On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 4:33 PM, Sailesh Panchang <spanchang02@yahoo.com> wrote: > Greetings, > Is it okay to omit the alt on an img element inside a figure element and > rely on the figcaption to provide the text alternative? > > As a screen reader user, I am not in favor of doing away with the alt or > even setting a null alt on the img because I do not realize that there is > an actual image present; nor can I use image-navigation to quickly move to > the image. Nor can I copy / save the image locally if I wished to. > The examples within HTML5 specs do use an a non-empty alt for images > within a figure which is perfectly fine by me. > I am in favor of flagging a violation if alt is absent or is null on an > img within a figure. > Thoughts? > Thanks very much, > Sailesh Panchang > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 21 July 2015 21:50:08 UTC