- From: Christophe Strobbe <strobbe@hdm-stuttgart.de>
- Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 00:22:46 +0100
- To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
- Message-ID: <54BEE346.3060003@hdm-stuttgart.de>
Hi, On 20/01/2015 20:17, Jonathan Avila wrote: > > SC 1.4.5 indicates exceptions can be made when technology being used > cannot achieve the desired visual presentation. I wanted to know > other people’s thoughts on whether the technology delivery mechanism > may also be a factor taken into account. > > > > For example, many retail sites contain internal and vendor supplied > product advertisements. > For sites with third-party content, WCAG also has the concept of "Statement of Partial Conformance - Third Party Content", but this is strictly a statement of non-conformance. > These materials may be delivered to a client as images. Other times > the client simply wants a promotion code or teaser to appear in a > certain way. How much flexibility is actually allowed in meeting the > success criteria. Would we need to evaluate the font face, > anti-aliasing, and all of the factors discussed. Put another way what > information would need to be collected to provide proof that the > technology available could not be used to achieve the desired visual > presentation. > > > Best regards, Christophe -- Christophe Strobbe Akademischer Mitarbeiter Responsive Media Experience Research Group (REMEX) Hochschule der Medien Nobelstraße 10 70569 Stuttgart Tel. +49 711 8923 2749 "La vie est courte, hélas! et je n'ai pas encore lu tous mes livres!" (d'après Mallarmé).
Received on Tuesday, 20 January 2015 23:23:15 UTC