- From: Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL <ryladog@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2015 18:38:09 -0500
- To: "'David MacDonald'" <david100@sympatico.ca>, "'WCAG'" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <073d01d02b9c$298c0880$7ca41980$@gmail.com>
Great article David. I agree we should discuss and tighten up. I see it as a failure of 1.1.1, 2.4.1 (for frame), and 4.1.2.
* katie *
Katie Haritos-Shea
Senior Accessibility SME (WCAG/Section 508/ADA/AODA)
Cell: 703-371-5545 | <mailto:ryladog@gmail.com> ryladog@gmail.com | Oakton, VA | <http://www.linkedin.com/in/katieharitosshea/> LinkedIn Profile | Office: 703-371-5545
From: David MacDonald [mailto:david100@sympatico.ca]
Sent: Thursday, January 8, 2015 5:10 PM
To: WCAG
Subject: We may need greater clarity of when its a failure to omit title attribute from an iframe
I've put up a bunch of tests with AT and browsers for the title on an iframe. I think we may want to discuss and tighten up some of H6 and maybe parts of the understanding doc. Especially in the case of ads and video players embedded in a web page.
In the article, the general consensus is that it is usually a failure to omit the title attribute from an iframe, but there is quite a bit of diversity from a11y professionals which is captured in the article.
http://davidmacd.com/blog/is-title-attribute-on-iframe-required-by-wcag.html
Cheers,
David MacDonald
CanAdapt Solutions Inc.
Tel: 613.235.4902
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100> LinkedIn
<http://www.Can-Adapt.com> www.Can-Adapt.com
Adapting the web to all users
Including those with disabilities
If you are not the intended recipient, please review our <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html> privacy policy
Received on Thursday, 8 January 2015 23:38:41 UTC