- From: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
- Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 13:17:29 -0400
- To: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, Gregg Vanderheiden RTF <gregg@raisingthefloor.org>
- Message-ID: <BLU437-SMTP491F09FCCB012928685FDEFEC30@phx.gbl>
There is a discussion in today's meeting about possibly amending technique authoring process to possibly move the Techniques out of TR space going forward to speed up the cycle. This is in the new Charter proposal. http://www.w3.org/2015/04/draft-wcag-charter Section 2 Deliverables "Understanding WCAG 2.0 <http://www.w3.org/TR/UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20/>, to be published as a W3C Working Group Note or as a curated resource of the Working Group. Understanding WCAG 2.0 explains the intent of each Success Criterion and links to known sufficient techniques, both general and technology-specific;" The proposal in the charter allows the group to go either way, so the discussion is not a show stopper for the Charter. However, there is a discussion that the weight and authority of failures might be affected by this, and there may be legal implications in environments that look to the common failures as evidence in court. I would be interested in a fairly wide discussion of this, which includes prior WCAG member and affected jurisdictions... I think there are court cases all over the world that cite a WCAG failure technique violations as an authoritative indication that a web site (page) doesn't meet WCAG requirements. Similarly, there may be some circumstances of web masters are defending their claims that they met WCAG by citing a WCAG technique. Cheers, David MacDonald *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.* Tel: 613.235.4902 LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100> www.Can-Adapt.com * Adapting the web to all users* * Including those with disabilities* If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>
Received on Tuesday, 19 May 2015 17:18:01 UTC