- From: Adam Solomon <adam.solomon2@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 09:20:58 +0300
- To: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CALKv3=jY5kP7h2W1pZt5RHfbhuo_WfHMLNW6LEPHhy86_bQW2g@mail.gmail.com>
F68 states that it is applicable to "HTML and XHTML controls that use visible labels" Which would seemingly exclude scope of aria-label, title etc. for this failure. This failure applies in its current form to 1.3.1 <http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/NOTE-UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20-20140916/content-structure-separation-programmatic.html> (among others). Is it correct to say that 1.3.1 only requires that a visible label be programmatically determined, whereas a control with no visible label whatsoever would not fail 1.3.1 (because there is no relationship to convey and users without any accessibility needs are at a similar disadvantage), and that is why ARIA-14 is not a sufficient technique for 1.3.1 whereas ARIA-16 is However, regarding 4.1.2 <http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/NOTE-UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20-20140916/ensure-compat-rsv.html> (name role value) a control without any label or title or aria attribute would fail, and so ARIA-14 is a technique for 4.1.2. Is all of the above correct? Thank you in advance for your feedback
Received on Wednesday, 17 September 2014 06:21:27 UTC