- From: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
- Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 12:16:36 -0400
- To: Jonathan Avila <jon.avila@ssbbartgroup.com>
- CC: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <BLU436-SMTP10044D22197938E9FA501B6FED30@phx.gbl>
I don't remember any specific discussions of that over the years, but our definition of a web page is it's URL location. Since the iFrame is included in the DOM of a page from the hosting page which originates from a URL I interpret that to mean inheritance ks sufficient. Otherwise, it would get messy for servers ide programming that gathers up information from many destinations... Having said that, I usually try to discourage iframes for complex content because they don't always play nice with screen readers... but I don't map it to a failure... Cheers, David MacDonald *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.* Tel: 613.235.4902 LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100> www.Can-Adapt.com * Adapting the web to all users* * Including those with disabilities* If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html> On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 9:54 PM, Jonathan Avila <jon.avila@ssbbartgroup.com> wrote: > If an HTML page can only be accessed via an iframe within another > document and is in the same language as the parent document – is the HTML > page in the iframe subject to the success criteria for page titles and > document language? Are pages allowed to meet the SC via inherited page > titles and languages. Any thoughts? > > > > Best Regards, > > > > Jonathan >
Received on Thursday, 21 August 2014 16:17:06 UTC