- From: Jonathan Avila <jon.avila@ssbbartgroup.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 20:23:22 -0400
- To: Mike Elledge <melledge@yahoo.com>, Aurélien Levy <aurelien.levy@temesis.com>
- Cc: WCAG WG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <516a2ba8a980439716e1f43ff40f0f4a@mail.gmail.com>
Ø Would this be considered a usability issue, then? Yes, if you were only testing WCAG Level A and AA and zoom worked in the accessibility supported technology stack then yes this would just be a usability issue. I absolutely agree that many of us want to just enlarge the text and not everything else – unfortunately I wasn’t involved in these initial discussions and technique/failure creation and this is the direction the WG went at that time. Changing that stance now would likely be very difficult. I do consider mobile web sites that limit the user scaling to 1.0 as failing this SC 1.4.4. For example, Safari on iOS doesn’t provide an override like other browsers and thus I don’t consider it accessibility supported. Jonathan *From:* Mike Elledge [mailto:melledge@yahoo.com] *Sent:* Wednesday, July 16, 2014 4:39 PM *To:* Jon Avila; Aurélien Levy *Cc:* WCAG WG *Subject:* Re: SC failure for using pixel font size Hi Jon-- Would this be considered a usability issue, then? I would imagine that some people with low vision would want to increase font size without enlarging the rest of the page. Fixed font sizes would make that impossible and could make the page more difficult to use because of scrolling. If I understand the question correctly, I would also disagree with the stance. <smile> Mike On Wednesday, July 16, 2014 1:22 PM, Jon Avila <jon.avila@ssbbartgroup.com> wrote: Not under WCAG 2 level A or AA but It would likely but not necessarily fail under level AAA SC 1.4.8. SC 1.4.4 allows for user agent zoom to compensate for use of pixel. So the only time use of pixels would fail this SC is if it wasn't accessibility supported by the technology stack. Personally I don't totally agree with this stance because zoom requires the user to scroll horizontally. Under 1.4.8. It would have to zoom without horizontal scroll - this is less likely to be handles correctly when pixels are used. Jon On Jul 16, 2014, at 12:58 PM, Aurélien Levy <aurelien.levy@temesis.com> wrote: Hi, I have others questions like the one last week about opening new window without prior notice for the working group members. I will do each one on a separate thread for more clarity. Do you consider using pixel font size for text in a as a WCAG success criteria failure ? (example : <p class="myfont">some dummy text</p> .myfont{font-size:12px;} If yes to witch success criteria ? I'm especially interested to have your opinion one the 1.4.4 SC because I don't see anything saying it's a failure except on text based form controls (witch isn't the case in my example) so for me it isn't. And you what do you think ? Regards, -- Aurélien Levy ---- Temesis
Received on Thursday, 17 July 2014 00:25:01 UTC