- From: Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2014 09:37:25 -0500
- To: WebKeyIT <v.conway@webkeyit.com>, 'Andrew Kirkpatrick' <akirkpat@adobe.com>, 'WCAG' <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- CC: 'WCAG Editors' <team-wcag-editors@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <52CEB425.9060208@w3.org>
We didn't create a diff yet. We'll work on that but meanwhile you can use a diff service to compare the docs. The following URI should give a reasonable diff: http://services.w3.org/htmldiff?doc1=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FTR%2FUNDERSTANDING-WCAG20%2Fcomplete&doc2=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FWAI%2FGL%2F2014%2FWD-UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20-20140107%2Fcomplete Michael On 2014-01-09 6:52 AM, WebKeyIT wrote: > > Is it possible to see a differentiated version so that we can see > where the change occur? > > *Regards,*** > > ** > > *Vivienne Conway, B.IT (Hons), MACS CT, AALIA(CS)* > > Director > > Web Key IT Pty Ltd > > PO BOX 681 Wanneroo, WA 6946 > > *M* 0415 383 673 *F* (08) 9325 6422 > > *E*v.conway@webkeyit.com <mailto:vivienne.conway@webkeyit.com>__ > > *W *www.webkeyit.com <http://www.webkeyit.com/> > > This communication, including any attachments, is intended solely for > the named addressee. It is confidential and may be subject to legal > professional privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, please > contact me immediately by reply email, delete it from your system and > destroy any copies. This email is subject to copyright, no part of it > should be reproduced, adapted or transmitted without the prior written > consent of the copyright owner. Any views expressed in this message > are those of the individual sender and may not necessarily reflect the > views of Web Key IT Pty Ltd. > > *From:*Andrew Kirkpatrick [mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com] > *Sent:* Thursday, 9 January 2014 3:55 AM > *To:* WCAG (w3c-wai-gl@w3.org) > *Cc:* WCAG Editors > *Subject:* Techniquies and Understanding editor drafts ready for > review, and approval for publication > *Importance:* High > > Group, > > The updated versions of techniques, understanding, and QuickRef are > posted and ready for your review. We are asking that everyone take a > review these and indicate by Friday of this week if you have any > objections to sharing these as a public draft. > > There are a couple of issues that we’ve identified that you don’t need > to comment on but I want to make you aware of. These will be > addressed before Tuesday. > > 1)Not all examples have titles. > > 2)Working version of Example 2 for ARIA18 has some code issues that > will either be addressed or the working example will be pulled. The > code for Example 2 also has issues (invalid code) that can be addressed. > > 3)The User Agent notes for all techniques will be extracted to a > separate document per our decision early this year, and each technique > will point to the separate document. > > Please take a look as soon as possible. Thanks for the hard work > getting this to this point everyone! > > https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/techunderstandpublic/ > > Thanks, > > AWK > > Andrew Kirkpatrick > > Group Product Manager, Accessibility > > Adobe Systems > > akirkpat@adobe.com <mailto:akirkpatrick@adobe.com> > > http://twitter.com/awkawk > > http://blogs.adobe.com/accessibility >
Received on Thursday, 9 January 2014 14:37:38 UTC