W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > October to December 2013

RE: UNS: Re: WCAG considering amending F65 to NOT fail missing ALT text if title or aria-label is present

From: Adrian Roselli <Roselli@algonquinstudios.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 16:22:34 +0000
To: Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net>, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
CC: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>, HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>, WCAG WG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, "public-comments-wcag20@w3.org" <public-comments-wcag20@w3.org>, Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>, "kirsten@can-adapt.com" <kirsten@can-adapt.com>
Message-ID: <0CB063710346B446A5B5DC305BF8EA3E2DECB508@Ex2010MBX.development.algonquinstudios.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Janina Sajka [mailto:janina@rednote.net]
> Frankly, I'm unclear why you even took this discussion to Twitter. What did
> you expect to gain and how are we to understand the value of any results?
> What good does this do? What value does it add?

I'd like to note that I wrote an overview on my blog yesterday [1] and also solicited feedback from the community.

I don't consider this to be random voting, nor do I expect the respondents have all the context. I also know that my followers (all 2 of them) hold a similar view as I do, so I don't expect to hear a viewpoint different from my own.

I do, however, hope to discover some nuggets (for either viewpoint) that maybe I had not considered that I can bring back here for discussion. I don't think lack of membership here precludes having a voice, though I do see the value in having somebody collecting that information to present back here.

And for the record, I am against loosening alt attribute restrictions, as I was against it the last time it came around for discussion.

1. http://blog.adrianroselli.com/2013/11/image-alt-exception-change-re-re-re.html
Received on Monday, 25 November 2013 16:23:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 21:07:54 UTC