- From: Loretta Guarino Reid <lorettaguarino@google.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 14:16:29 -0700
- To: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, "w3c-wai-pf@w3.org Formats" <w3c-wai-pf@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAHu5OWbY7HasWV56ZsiNnXBQiqQAWNi9qYu5zij+LCnopiX21Q@mail.gmail.com>
Minutes from today's meeting can be found at http://www.w3.org/2013/08/22-html-techs-tf-minutes.html ARIA-edit: F85: Failure of Success Criterion 2.4.3 due to using dialogs or menus that are not adjacent to their trigger control in the sequential navigation order loretta has added detlev's suggested additional text to explain why dialogs inserted at the end of the page can be problematic detlev suggests making the syntax gender neutral - loretta will make the change detlev: re jon's comment of having a good example (non failure) - might be confusing - loretta: we basically have adopted this convention of not having a success example in a failure loretta: leave this technique open because of edits we just made detlev: we should really have a technique for properly scripting dialog with correct focus behavior loretta: add to the wiki page this suggested technique - need a good title <pauljadam> http://pauljadam.com/moderna11y/#dialogs <Detlev> http://3needs.org/en/testing/code/role-dialog-3.html resolution: leave F85 open <Loretta> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/20130815ttf/results#xlabel Using ARIA Live Regions or role=alert to Identify Errors resolution: paul will check out comments from survey and make edits for next meeting ARIA-edit: F86: Failure of Success Criterion 4.1.2 due to not providing names for each part of a multi-part form field, such as a US telephone number loretta: will edit per detlev's comment re aria-label and id is describedby sufficient here? if describedby has support - it doesnt fail detlev - we could add generic reference to aria instead of detailing which properties satisfy <Loretta> http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG-TECHS/failures.html#F86 loretta: we could leave off alternative procedure for html,xhtml ... perhaps we could mention that each form field needs a name w/o specifying what the name needs to be ... i will take another stab at this based upon our comments here
Received on Thursday, 22 August 2013 21:16:56 UTC