RE: How to meet

I think this addresses my thinking regarding referencing various techniques as part of the explanation of applicability.

From: Gregg Vanderheiden [mailto:gv@trace.wisc.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 2:42 AM
To: Kerstin Probiesch
Cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Subject: Re: How to meet

The only thing that is normative is the WCAG 2.0 document itself.
HOWEVER - the "how to meet" title of the document is cited throughout WCAG 2.0.  So we cannot change the title of the document.  But we can add introductory text to the How to Meet document to make its purpos clearer



Gregg
--------------------------------------------------------
Gregg Vanderheiden Ph.D.
Director Trace R&D Center
Professor Industrial & Systems Engineering
and Biomedical Engineering
University of Wisconsin-Madison

Co-Director, Raising the Floor - International
and the Global Public Inclusive Infrastructure Project
http://Raisingthefloor.org   ---   http://GPII.net








On May 30, 2012, at 1:29 AM, Kerstin Probiesch wrote:


Hi all,

one question on "how to meet": Is the wording "how to meet" itself normative
or informative and would it be possible to change the wording or not?
Background is, that there are ongoing misunderstandings about the character
of the techniques.

Cheers

Kerstin


-------------------------------------
Kerstin Probiesch - Freie Beraterin
Barrierefreiheit, Social Media, Webkompetenz
Kantstraße 10/19 | 35039 Marburg
Tel.: 06421 167002
Web: http://www.barrierefreie-informationskultur.de

XING: http://www.xing.com/profile/Kerstin_Probiesch
Twitter: http://twitter.com/kprobiesch
------------------------------------

Das Buch zur Barrierefreiheit:


Barrierefreiheit verstehen und umsetzen:
Webstandards für ein zugängliches und nutzbares Internet
812 S., Dpunkt Verlag, Auflage: 1 (März 2011)