- From: Tina Holmboe <tina@greytower.net>
- Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 11:32:51 +0200
- To: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
- Cc: 'WCAG' <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 05:12:51PM -0400, David MacDonald wrote: > Wondering about other's opinions on fallbacks for inaccessible Javascript > drop down menus, where the top of the menu is a normal link, but the > dropdown items below them are not accessible. However, all the links in the I'd say that's the wrong way around. Make sure the menu, ie. the list of links, is accessible, then apply the JS. The "old way", in other words. > in WCAG ... But of course Longdesc provides an alternative for the image on > another page and in that respect is a precedent for providing a fallback at Now, I don't know the background for this discussion, but: The longdesc attribute does not provide an *alternative* for the image, but rather a verbose *description* of it - in a hyperlinked document. -- Tina Holmboe Greytower Technologies www.greytower.net CEO Quality and Accessibility www.sitesifter.co.uk blog.greytower.net www.twitter.com/GreytowerTech
Received on Thursday, 19 April 2012 09:33:20 UTC