- From: Boland Jr, Frederick E. <frederick.boland@nist.gov>
- Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 09:28:35 -0400
- To: 'WCAG' <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Fyi.. from Jan Richards -----Original Message----- From: Richards, Jan [mailto:jrichards@ocad.ca] Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2011 11:07 PM To: Boland Jr, Frederick E. Subject: RE: ATAG compliant Authoring Tools Yes, that's fine. Thanks, Jan -- (Mr) Jan Richards, M.Sc. jrichards@ocad.ca | 416-977-6000 ext. 3957 | fax: 416-977-9844 Inclusive Design Research Centre (IDRC) | http://idrc.ocad.ca/ Faculty of Design | OCAD University > -----Original Message----- > From: Boland Jr, Frederick E. [mailto:frederick.boland@nist.gov] > Sent: July 14, 2011 7:12 PM > To: Richards, Jan > Subject: RE: ATAG compliant Authoring Tools > > Thanks - can I forward your response to the WCAG WG list? > ________________________________________ > From: Richards, Jan [jrichards@ocad.ca] > Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2011 5:05 PM > To: Boland Jr, Frederick E. > Subject: RE: ATAG compliant Authoring Tools > > Hi Tim, > > I think it is very likely that there will be some editors that comply > this time around. But we are still compiling implementations. > > Cheers, > Jan > > > -- > (Mr) Jan Richards, M.Sc. > jrichards@ocad.ca | 416-977-6000 ext. 3957 | fax: 416-977-9844 > Inclusive Design Research Centre (IDRC) | http://idrc.ocad.ca/ > Faculty of Design | OCAD University > > From: Boland Jr, Frederick E. [mailto:frederick.boland@nist.gov] > Sent: July 14, 2011 3:32 PM > To: Richards, Jan > Subject: FW: ATAG compliant Autoring Tools > > What should the response be (re: forwarded message following posted to > the WCAG WG list)? > Best, Tim Boland > > PS - thanks for working with me on the ATAG comments.. > > From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On > Behalf Of David MacDonald > Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2011 1:42 PM > To: 'WCAG' > Subject: ATAG compliant Autoring Tools > > A couple of years ago the general consensus was although many of web > authoring tools implemented some or many recommendations from ATAG, > there was not one that was actually compliant... is that still true? > > David MacDonald
Received on Friday, 15 July 2011 13:29:03 UTC