- From: Boland Jr, Frederick E. <frederick.boland@nist.gov>
- Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 18:02:16 -0400
- To: "w3c-wai-gl@w3.org" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <D7A0423E5E193F40BE6E94126930C4930878731AC1@MBCLUSTER.xchange.nist.gov>
fyi Best Tim Boland NIST ________________________________ From: Richards, Jan [jrichards@ocad.ca] Sent: Friday, May 20, 2011 10:11 AM To: Boland Jr, Frederick E. Subject: RE: fyi - discussion in WCAG on -web-content Hi Tim, Sure, thanks for asking. And I would add that I think the issue of whether the file is at a URI or local is a bit of a red herring since it’s very possible to have an HTML website in a local folder for local offline use. ...and the Excel application...is definitely capable of being a web content Authoring Tool (as per ATAG2). Cheers, Jan -- (Mr) Jan Richards, M.Sc. jrichards@ocad.ca | 416-977-6000 ext. 3957 | fax: 416-977-9844 Inclusive Design Research Centre (IDRC) | http://idrc.ocad.ca/ Faculty of Design | OCAD University From: Boland Jr, Frederick E. [mailto:frederick.boland@nist.gov] Sent: May 20, 2011 9:58 AM To: Richards, Jan Subject: RE: fyi - discussion in WCAG on -web-content Thanks so much for your insights. Is it OK to forward this message on to Loretta (for contribution to WCAG discussion)? Best, Tim ________________________________ From: Richards, Jan [jrichards@ocad.ca] Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2011 5:00 PM To: Boland Jr, Frederick E. Subject: RE: fyi - discussion in WCAG on -web-content Hi Tim, Thanks for the heads up... My 2-cents are that it depends. Excel docs are best considered web content when they include images, media, links to other resources etc. As you may know, we (the IDRC) did a project to produce guidance on how to produce accessible office documents. Here’s the overview: http://adod.idrc.ocad.ca/overview In it, we had to figure out where to make a reasonable split between web content and office document content. Here’s what we came up with: The ADOD Assessment Framework specifically targets office documents, which are defined as computer documents that are: * Intended to be used by people (i.e., not computer code), * Text-based (i.e., not simply images, although they may contain images), * Fully printable (i.e., where dynamic features are limited to automatic page numbering, table of contents, etc. and do not include audio, video, or embedded interactivity), * Self-contained (i.e., without hyperlinks to other resources unlike web content), and * Typical of office-style workflows (Reports, letters, memos, budgets, presentations, etc.). That said, it doesn’t really matter too much since our ADOD assessment framework was just a subset of WCAG 2.0 anyway. Cheers, Jan -- (Mr) Jan Richards, M.Sc. jrichards@ocad.ca | 416-977-6000 ext. 3957 | fax: 416-977-9844 Inclusive Design Research Centre (IDRC) | http://idrc.ocad.ca/ Faculty of Design | OCAD University From: Boland Jr, Frederick E. [mailto:frederick.boland@nist.gov] Sent: May 19, 2011 4:13 PM To: Richards, Jan Subject: fyi - discussion in WCAG on -web-content There is an interesting discussion going on in WCAG WG list currently about definition of web content/web resource/user agent, in the context of Excel spreadsheet (is Excel –web-content)?. There is a lot on the GL mail list recently on this.. I mention this because may have relevance to/implications for ATAG (and previous AUWG discussions), and Jutta is mentioned in one of the posts I think. Just thought you might want to know.. hope I’m not violating any confidences, but the GL list I think is public.. Thanks Tim
Received on Friday, 20 May 2011 22:03:52 UTC