- From: Mary Utt <maryutt@paciellogroup.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 11:39:46 -0400
- To: Loretta Guarino Reid <lorettaguarino@google.com>
- Cc: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 9:17 PM, Loretta Guarino Reid <lorettaguarino@google.com> wrote: > "Assistive Technology" -> "assistive technology" Done. > I suggest changing the text of the link working example of marking a > background image as an artifact (Word file)" to " working example of > creating a decorative image (Word file)", since the current text makes me > think that there is a way to mark the image as an artifact from Word. Done. > Change the test procedure: "For each image that is purely decorative" -> > "For an image that is purely decorative" Done. > Change"Use a tool that exposes the document through the accessibility API > and verify that decorative images are marked as artifacts." to "Use a tool > that exposes the document through the accessibility API and verify that the > decorative image is not exposed through the API." Done. > Remove the reference to tabbing to the image from this test procedure step: > "Read the PDF document with a screen reader, listening to hear that the > decorative image is not announced when tabbing to the image (if it is > tabbable) or when reading the content line-by-line." Changed to: "Read the PDF document with a screen reader, listening to hear that the decorative image is not announced when reading the content line-by-line." > (If the image is the only content of an interactive control, by definition > it is not decorative; if it is part of the content that also contains text, > it gets very complicated to explain what the requirement is.) > > >
Received on Tuesday, 19 April 2011 15:40:13 UTC