- From: Mary Utt <maryutt@paciellogroup.com>
- Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 13:17:36 -0400
- To: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>
- Cc: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
I agree with Andrew. Would the add'l 30 mins be added before or after the current meeting time? Thanks, Mary On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 11:50 AM, Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com> wrote: > I grudgingly support the idea of 2 hour meetings. :) > > Thanks, > AWK > > Andrew Kirkpatrick > Group Product Manager, Accessibility > Adobe Systems > > akirkpat@adobe.com > http://twitter.com/awkawk > http://blogs.adobe.com/accessibility > > > -----Original Message----- > From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Loretta Guarino Reid > Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2010 6:24 PM > To: WCAG > Subject: 2 hour meetings? > > The question was raised at today's meeting whether we should resume 2 > hour meetings, to cover techniques more quickly. We don't have an > external deadline that we must meet for our next update, but the > sooner we can publish, the more information is available to authors, > tool writers, and users. > > So, please let us know how you feel about switching to a 2 hour teleconference. > > Loretta > > > >
Received on Saturday, 30 October 2010 15:34:21 UTC