- From: Johannes Koch <koch@w3development.de>
- Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2010 16:30:57 +0100
- To: WCAG-WG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Hi WCAG group, as the forwarded mail did not make it to public-wcag2-techs@w3.org, I try to get your attention via this list :-) -------- Original-Nachricht -------- Betreff: Wording of PDF techniques Datum: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 17:31:05 +0100 Von: Johannes Koch <koch@w3development.de> An: public-wcag2-techs@w3.org Hi, I had a look at some of the PDF techniques at <http://trace.wisc.edu/wcag_wiki/index.php?title=Category:PDF_Techniques>. There are some techniques which use PDF terms in the description and test procedures, see e.g. <http://trace.wisc.edu/wcag_wiki/index.php?title=Providing_an_E_entry_in_the_structure_element_dictionary_of_a_structure_element> Some other techniques require specific tools to be used in the test procedure, see e.g. <http://trace.wisc.edu/wcag_wiki/index.php?title=Applying_text_alternatives_to_non-text_objects>: 1. Open the PDF document in Adobe Acrobat 2. Open the 'Touch Up Reading Order tool'. All images in the document will have the text alternative displayed on the top left of each image. 3. Check that each image has an appropriate text alternative. The test instructions should be changed to use PDF terms, so that a) authoring tool developers know what they should implement, b) evaluation tool developers know what they should implement, c) evaluators are free to use another tool suitable for the job. Of course additional information about how to use specific tools to run the tests would be useful. But, after all, these techniques should be PDF techniques, not ToolXYZ techniques :-) -- Johannes Koch In te domine speravi; non confundar in aeternum. (Te Deum, 4th cent.) -- Johannes Koch In te domine speravi; non confundar in aeternum. (Te Deum, 4th cent.)
Received on Wednesday, 3 March 2010 15:31:34 UTC