- From: Roberto Scano \(IWA/HWG\) <r.scano@webprofession.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 14:04:29 +0100
- To: "'WCAG'" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Hi all, i think there is a mistake here: http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/NOTE-WCAG20-TECHS-20081211/G19 Note 1 said: --- Note 1: This technique is stricter than the Level 1 Success Criteria but is easier to test and can be used to meet the Level 1 Success Criteria because all failure thresholds in the Level 1 Success Criteria involve flashing 3.5 flashes or more within one second. Most content does not flash at all and even content that blinks does not blink this fast except on rare occasions. Therefore, in order to avoid having to carry out the more complex testing specified by the Success Criteria, one could follow this technique to ensure that content only flashes one, two, or at most three times in any 1-second period. --- But this Is a level 1 success criteria and i don't find any failure for the cited 3.5 flashes: http://www.w3.org/TR/UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20/seizure-does-not-violate.html --- Roberto Scano (rscano@webprofession.com) International Webmasters Association / HTML Writers Guild
Received on Thursday, 19 March 2009 13:05:07 UTC