- From: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>
- Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 13:38:10 -0800
- To: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Bruce, Can you describe a couple of specific scenarios that highlight your concerns? I think I understand what you are saying but I'm not sure that it isn't being handled as Andi suggests under 4.1.2. When a control value is changed, by the user or by a script, there is a valuechange event that is communicated for assistive technologies to use. Whether the AT does or not is another question. Thanks, AWK Andrew Kirkpatrick Senior Product Manager, Accessibility Adobe Systems akirkpat@adobe.com -----Original Message----- From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Bailey, Bruce Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 9:12 AM To: WCAG Subject: Silent / Hidden Automatically Updating Information I am thinking of a situation where a web app form element silently fills in data elsewhere on the form without explicitly alerting the end user. Assuming no other problems, like unexpected change of context, do we have an SC which requires that auto-updating data be proactively exposed to the end user? This is pretty standard AJAX behavior, but it is a problem that AT users are experiencing disproportionately. It is altogether too easy for a user to submit data that may be visually pretty obvious, but easy to miss when using screen magnification or screen reader (since the automatically updated information is hidden off screen or made silent by default by purposeful design). I am thinking maybe we missed this, since some aspect of the behavior is often desirable. Do we have something documented about this as far as best practices go? SC 2.2.2 (which is actually in the Enough Time GL 2.2) is pretty much a requirement for the opposite behavior. Updated information which does not interrupt the end-user would not violate 3.2.1 On Focus or 3.2.2 On Input. Being able to review a form for changes is required by 4.1.2 Name, Role, Value -- but there might be no indication that reviewing the form is warranted! Arguably, leaving out details that a form has automatically updated fields violates <q>instructions are provided when content requires user input</q> (3.3.2 Labels or Instructions) but that feels *very* tenuous to me. It is fine if I have just created an action item for myself, but then where would be the home for such a best practice advisory?
Received on Thursday, 8 January 2009 21:38:56 UTC