- From: Loretta Guarino Reid <lorettaguarino@google.com>
- Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:57:51 -0700
- To: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Could we get a volunteer to review this document to be sure that references to WCAG 2.0 are interpreting it correctly? Note requested deadline of May 15 (in 2 weeks). Loretta and Gregg ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Andrew Arch <andrew@w3.org> Date: Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 3:00 AM Subject: Developing a Web Accessibility Business Case for Your Organization To: team-wcag-editors@w3.org Cc: Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org>, WAI-AGE <team-wai-age@w3.org> Hi Gregg and Loretta, The WAI-AGE project has been updating the Web Accessibility Business Case to include more discussion of older people and to add WCAG 2.0 references. Before we publish the new version which will be ready for EOWG approval in May, we would like to have our inclusion of WCAG 2.0 SC ratified. Would the WCAG WG be able to review our SC references by May 15 when we expect EOWG to approve publication? The pages with WCAG 2.0 SC references are: http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/bcase/Overview.html http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/bcase/soc.html http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/bcase/tech.html http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/bcase/fin.html The page about Legal and Policy factors does not contain SC references. Thanks, Andrew -- Andrew Arch Web Accessibility and Ageing Specialist http://www.w3.org/People/Andrew/ http://www.w3.org/WAI/WAI-AGE/
Received on Wednesday, 29 April 2009 18:58:30 UTC