Re: blog comments on WCAG 2

Hi Tina,

At 12:11 14/11/2008, Tina Holmboe wrote:
>(...)
>   But I must say I am quite disappointed in the PR. It is still hard to
>   read, although the W3C has taken comments made by myself and quite a
>   few others on board and shaped it up tremendously.
>
>   My main gripe is the possibly unintentional, but gaping, holes left
>   for people to drive poorly coded pages/applications through. I am
>   hoping to post a summary of our experiences with this version of WCAG
>   as soon as the implementation work is done.

Can you clarify what you mean by "poorly coded"? Are there any 
accessibility issues that you have in mind?

Best regards,

Christophe


-- 
Christophe Strobbe
K.U.Leuven - Dept. of Electrical Engineering - SCD
Research Group on Document Architectures
Kasteelpark Arenberg 10 bus 2442
B-3001 Leuven-Heverlee
BELGIUM
tel: +32 16 32 85 51
http://www.docarch.be/
---
Please don't invite me to LinkedIn, Facebook, Quechup or other 
"social networks". You may have agreed to their "privacy policy", but 
I haven't.


Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm

Received on Friday, 14 November 2008 17:42:36 UTC