- From: Christophe Strobbe <christophe.strobbe@esat.kuleuven.be>
- Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 12:03:52 +0100
- To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
A few more blog comments on WCAG 2.0 PR: At <http://my.opera.com/ODIN/blog/wcag-2-0-3> Henny Swann writes: "I've actually been using it [WCAG 2.0] for a while and find it much easier to use than WCAG 1.0. It provides more techniques and advisory techniques, is more testable than WCAG 1.0 and has a wealth of supporting documentation and practical tools to help you implement the guidelines." At <http://stevenclark.com.au/2008/11/07/wcag-20-proposed-recommendation/>, Steven Clark writes that the "Tasmanian Government Website Standards" state that there is a requirement for conformance to WCAG 2.0. But there are also those who find it hard to read, like the first commenter on the blog post at <http://www.tomstardust.com/archives/wcag-20-le-nuove-linee-guida/>: "per me è arabo... non ne capisco affatto" ("It's all Arabic to me... I don't understand it at all"). The Web Standards Project asks for help to put together a list of useful resources for WCAG 2.0: <http://www.webstandards.org/2008/11/06/wcag-20-resources/>. Best regards, Christophe At 17:49 31/10/2008, Christophe Strobbe wrote: >Hi, > >>From: "Wayne Dick" <wed@csulb.edu> >>To: "WebAIM Discussion List" <webaim-forum@list.webaim.org> >>Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 09:43:14 -0700 >>Subject: Re: [WebAIM] Links in context - or not? >> >>(...) >>My main hope is that I get an accessibility compliant page. I >>have preferences on how to meet the standards, but I can do >>something reasonable with compliant code. Which standard do you >>use, 508, WCAG 1 or 2, other national or state laws the rely on >>WCAG as a base... Most standards cover everything, WCAG 2 is the >>easiest to read and implement. It doesn't matter. If the page >>meets standards, assistive technology can to something >>reasonable. > >Who had expected this: "WCAG 2 is the easiest to read and implement"? -- Christophe Strobbe K.U.Leuven - Dept. of Electrical Engineering - SCD Research Group on Document Architectures Kasteelpark Arenberg 10 bus 2442 B-3001 Leuven-Heverlee BELGIUM tel: +32 16 32 85 51 http://www.docarch.be/ --- Please don't invite me to LinkedIn, Facebook, Quechup or other "social networks". You may have agreed to their "privacy policy", but I haven't. Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm
Received on Friday, 14 November 2008 11:04:57 UTC