- From: Katie Haritos-Shea <ryladog@earthlink.net>
- Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 11:31:41 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Andi Snow-Weaver <andisnow@us.ibm.com>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Andi, But color is not the only way of indentifying the tabs (it is just used as a supplementary - which is helpful for all - but can be extra helpful to persons with cognitive disabilities.) The way I see it, the selected tab and its sub-menu are *first* associated with text and *then* associated through presentation (color). Katie -----Original Message----- >From: Andi Snow-Weaver <andisnow@us.ibm.com> >Sent: Apr 30, 2008 10:32 AM >To: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> >Subject: Tabbed navigation designs and 1.4 > > > >Take a look at this website: > >http://www.rnib.org.uk/xpedio/groups/public/documents/code/public_rnib003460.hcsp > >These tabbed navigation designs are quite common on a lot of websites. The >first row of links are "tabs" and the second row is a sub-menu of the >selected tab. The selected tab and its sub-menu are associated through >presentation (color). ARIA will provide a way to programmatically expose >this relationship conveyed through presentation (1.3). > >But what about 1.4? Color is the only "visual" means of conveying which tab >is selected. But is this a problem for someone with color vision deficits? >The particular color is not relevant. It's the contrast between the light >color (yellow) and the dark color (red) that the user needs to be able to >detect. > >Would this example fail 1.4? Should it? > >Andi > > * katie * Katie Haritos-Shea Section 508 Technical Policy Analyst 703-371-5545 People may forget exactly what it was that you said or did, but they will never forget how you made them feel.......
Received on Wednesday, 30 April 2008 15:32:19 UTC