FW: Metadata Proposal 3 for WCAG 2.0 (1 new Success Criteia - Level AAA)

 

Here is proposal 3.

 

Similar to #2 but has a new success criterion

 

 

Gregg

 -- ------------------------------ 

Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. 

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Katie Haritos-Shea [mailto:ryladog@earthlink.net] 
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2007 8:50 AM
To: Loretta Guarino Reid; Gregg Vanderheiden; Ben Caldwell @ Trace; Liddy
Nevile; Madeleine Rothberg; Jutta Treviranus; Andy Heath
Subject: Metadata Proposal 3 for WCAG 2.0 (1 new Success Criteia - Level
AAA)

 

All,

 

Proposal 3 is being sent before proposal 2.

 

The entire text of the Proposal is in this eamil, but is also attached as a
text file.

 

 


Metadata Proposal 3 for WCAG 2.0 (1 new Success Criteia - Level AAA):


Summary


 

 


WCAG Doc


Introduction: 


 

            1 new paragraph 

 


New Success Criteria for Guideline 1.1:


 

            1.1.3 Metadata Adaptations (Level AAA)

 

1.1.3 Metadata Adaptations: Perceivable alternatives to non-text content
[original components] are associated with the original by metadata that
identifies and describes both the original and the alternative components or
services. (Level AAA)

 

 

 


Understanding Doc


 


Introduction to Understanding WCAG 2.0:


 

Add a short paragraph and link (just before the 'Understanding the Four
Principles of 

Accessibility' heading) to the Understanding Metadata section.

 

Add:

            'Understanding Metadata' section

 

 


1.1.3 Metadata Adaptations


Create this page with all contents

 

 


- 3.1.5 Reading Level


 

Add metadata example for how to do this.

Add Advisory Techniques (2)

*               HTML Example: 

      XML Example: 

 


Techniques Doc


 

Add:

HTML Techniques: (2 New)

      (for 1.1.3)

      (for 3.1.5)

Add: New Heading Section:

      XML Techniques: (2)

      (for 1.1.3)

      (for 3.1.5)

 

AND/OR

 

Add: New Heading Section:

            Metadata Techniques: (4) 

 

      (for 1.1.3)

      (for 3.1.5)

 

-----


Notes


-----

 

 

All examples and techniques are created using metadata from already fully
approved and 

 

implemented international metadata standards.

 

Currently standards these are:

ISO IEC 24751 series - "Access for All" (2005)

 

I note that although the new metadata approach was developed for  

education, it is generally applicable, and is so considered by the  

Dublin Core metadata community.

 

For further details, please see:

 

http://www.imsglobal.org/accessibility (a number of documents available)

http://jtc1sc36.org/doc/36N1141.pdf (a nearly final version of the  

standard to be released very soon by ISO)

http://dublincore.org/groups/access (a generalised approach to AccessforAll
metadata)

 

 

 

 

 

****************************************************************************
*************

****************************************************************************
*************

 

 

********

 

DETAILS

 

********

 

 

 

---------

Guide Doc

---------

 

 

FIRST Part of Proposal 3 (for Guide Doc):

 

 

To:

 

Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0

(http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/)

 

 

Introduction

 

Add: as last new paragraph (after the bulleted list).......

 

One other emerging and important component of achieving web accessibility is
the proper use of standardized metadata. It is known that metadata can be
useful in bringing together people and relevant resources. There are several
recognized metadata standards which can be used to (among other things);
find alternative content and provide conformance claims. WCAG 2.0 has
provided general guidance, testable success criteria and techniques for
using metadata to improve accessibility of web content.

 

 

---------------------------------------------

 

 

 

SECOND Part of Proposal 3 (for Guide Doc):

 

 

Also To:

 

Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0

(http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/)

 

 

 

WCAG 2.0 Guidelines

 

Add:

 

New Success Criteria for Guideline 1.1:

 

 

1.1.3 Metadata Adaptations: Perceivable alternatives to non-text content
[original components] are associated with the original by metadata that
identifies and describes both the original and the alternative components or
services. (Level AAA)

 

NOTE: This is not instead-of alt text use, but rather, additional to it.

 

[link to] How to Meet 1.1.3 

[link to] Understanding 1.1.3

 

 

 

Discussion:  The content for Understanding Doc and How to Meet will have to
be created.

 

 

Example for HTML Technique for 1.1.3: H80: Providing, in metadata, URL(s)
that points to an 

audio descrition and a text transcript of a video.

 

Example of XML Technique for 1.1.3: XML10: Providing, in metadata, URL(s)
that points to an 

audio descrition and a text transcript of a video.

 

Info for SC: For HTML/XHTML metadata can be provided either in the meta or
body component of 

the document, or both.

 

 

 

 

****************************************************************************
**********

 

 

-----------------

Understanding Doc

-----------------

 

 

THIRD Part of Proposal 3 (for Understanding Doc):

 

 

To:

 

Understanding WCAG 2.0 

A guide to understanding and implementing WCAG 2.0 

(http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/WD-UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20/)

 

 

 

 

Table of Contents: (Links)

 

      Understanding Success Criterion 1.1.3 [Metadata Adaptations]

      Understanding Metadata (put after 'Understanding Conformance' link)

 

 

Introduction to Understanding WCAG 2.0:

 

      Add a short paragraph and link (just before the 'Understanding the
Four Principles  of Accessibility' heading) to the Understanding Metadata
section.

 

 

Add:

      A new 'Understanding Metadata' section

 

 

Accessibility information in metadata can be utilized by browsers, indexing,
search agents and web services to bring people and relevant resources
together.

 

Metadata is a technical name for the description that is machine  readable
of some data . This usually means it is a formally  structured description.
There are a number of formalities for such metadata, some aimed towards the
sort of descriptions people use for books in libraries, and some focused on
specific aspects of the data, or resource, as it is commonly known. Like
catalog records, metadata does not have to be part of the resource but it
can be attached to it by being included, like the label on a tin of food, or
stored somewhere else for convenience and searching. It is often useful to
know who made the description, and when, especially if the resource is
likely to have changed. Descriptions of resources are useful to  

users because they can find out, without having to see the resource itself,
if it is going to satisfy their needs. In the case of accessibility needs,
knowing the exact attributes of the resource of concern to an individual
might help them choose what suits them even  

when it may not suit everyone.

 

......Explanation in simple terms will continue here that discusses history,
state of 

metadata stanadrds now, and what authors should do to implements..........

 

Main points to emphasise: 

 * metadata is necessary to find accessible resources

 * the AccessForAll approach is good for authenticating sites etc ie
metadata for resource and user

 * metadata supports WCAG and complements it in 2 ways - helps individuals
find what THEY need and publishers to target users more exactly and esp
helps when a resource is not 

universally accessible...

 * metadata supports individual users not just a community with similar
assumed needs and prefs

 * metadata allows for needs AND prefs - not all users treated the same

 * metadata very good for accessibility experts adding special components to
make existing resources more accessible

 * metadata makes personal optimisation possible

 * avoids the problem that optimisation for some users may make resources
inaccessible for others

 * allows dynamically varying requirements as environment changes

 * bridges the gap between product design and contexts of use (not only
device contexts)

 * responds to individual user's precise need/preference instead of guessed
generic requirements

 

 

 

-----------------------------------------------------------------

 

 

 

--------------------------

1.1.3 Metadata Adaptations

--------------------------

 

FOURTH Part of Proposal 3 (for Understanding Doc):

 

 

Create: 

 

Understanding Success Criterion 1.1.3 [Metadata Adaptations]

http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/WD-UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20/metadata-adaptations
.html

 

Create this page with all contents

 

 

-----------------------------------------------------------------

 

 

 

-------------------

3.1.5 Reading Level

-------------------

 

FIFTH Part of Proposal 3 (for Understanding Doc):

 

 

To: 

 

Understanding Success Criterion 3.1.5 [Reading Level]

http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/WD-UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20/meaning-supplements.
html

 

 

 

Add:

 

Examples of Success Criterion 3.1.5

 

Metadata Examples of Success Criterion 3.1.5

 

      HTML Example: Providing, in metadata, URL(s) that point to a


      pre-primary-reading-level and a primary-reading-level text transcript
of a new

      scientific discovery advanced-reading-level article.

 

      XML Example: Providing, in metadata, URL(s) that point to a


      pre-primary-reading-level and a primary-reading-level text transcript
of a new      

      scientific discovery advanced-reading-level article.

 

 

 

 

 

Techniques and Failures for Success Criterion 3.1.5 [Reading Level]

 

 

Add to:

 

Additional Techniques (Advisory) for 3.1.5

 

      After 5th bullet...

      "Using the Dublin Core accessibility element to associate text content
with text,       graphical, or spoken supplements (future link)" 

 

      Add bullet

      "Using the ISO AfA accessibility element to associate text content
with text,             graphical, or spoken supplements (future link)"

 

      Add bullet

      "Using the IMS accessibility element to associate text content with
text, graphical, 

      or spoken supplements (future link)"

 

 

and 

 

      Making metadata viewable by humans (future link) 

 

 

 

 

 

****************************************************************************
**************

 

 

--------------

Techniques Doc

--------------

 

 

FIFTH Part of Proposal 3 (for Techniques Doc):

 

 

To: 

 

Techniques for WCAG 2.0

Techniques and Failures for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0

(http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/WD-WCAG20-TECHS/)

 

 

 

Add:

 

HTML Techniques: (New)

 

      (for 1.1.3)

 

      H80: Providing, in metadata, URL(s) that points to an audio
description and a text 

 

      transcript of a video.

 

 

      (for 3.1.5)

 

      H81: Providing, in metadata, URL(s) that point to a
pre-primary-reading-level 

      and a primary-reading-level text transcript of a new scientific
discovery     

      advanced-reading-level article.

 

 

 

 

Add: New Heading Section(s):

 

 

      XML Techniques: 

 

      (for 1.1.3)

 

      XML10: Providing, in metadata, URL(s) that points to an audio
descrition and a text 

      transcript of a video.

 

 

      (for 3.1.5)

 

      XML11: Providing, in metadata, URL(s) that point to a
pre-primary-reading-level and 

      a primary-reading-level text transcript of a new scientific discovery


      advanced-reading-level article.

 

 

 

AND/OR

 

 

      Metadata Techniques: 

 

      (for 1.1.3)

 

      M1: HTML Example: Providing, in metadata, URL(s) that points to an
audio descrition 

      and a text transcript of a video.

 

      M2: XML Example: Providing, in metadata, URL(s) that points to an
audio descrition 

      and a text transcript of a video

 

 

      (for 3.1.5)

 

      M3: HTML Example: Providing, in metadata, URL(s) that point to a
pre-primary-reading-level and a primary-reading-level text transcript of a
new          scientific discovery advanced-reading-level article.

 

      M4: XML Example: Providing, in metadata, URL(s) that point to a
pre-primary-reading-level and a primary-reading-level text transcript of a
new          scientific discovery advanced-reading-level article.

 

 

 

 

 

 

****************************************************************************
****************

 

 

---------------

Quick Reference

---------------

 

 

SIXTH Part of Proposal 3 (for Quick Reference Doc):

 

 

To:

 

WCAG 2.0 Quick Reference

A customizable list of WCAG 2.0 requirements (success criteria) and
techniques

(http://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG20/quickref/20070730/Overview.php)

 

 

Add: boxes for checkpoint 1.1.3

 

      1.1.3 Metadata Adaptations: Perceivable alternatives to non-text
content [original       components] are associated with the original by
metadata that identifies and       describes both the original and the
alternative components or services. (Level AAA)

 

 

Sufficient Techniques for 1.1.3 [Metadata Adaptations] 

(for the technologies you checked above)

 

      H80: Providing, in metadata, URL(s) that points to an audio descrition
and a text       transcript of a video.

 

 

 

 

 

END Proposal 3

 

****************************************************************************
****************

 

****************************************************************************
****************

 

 

 

 

* katie *

 

Katie Haritos-Shea 

Section 508 Technical Policy Analyst

 

703-371-5545

 

People may forget exactly what it was that you said or did, 

but they will never forget how you made them feel.......

Received on Thursday, 27 September 2007 16:24:46 UTC