- From: Sailesh Panchang <spanchang02@yahoo.com>
- Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 12:41:25 -0700 (PDT)
- To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
- Cc: Loretta Guarino Reid <lorettaguarino@google.com>
Refer http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2007/08/28-conformance-proposal.htm > A few thoughts (first two (of four) are editorial: "1.) Conformance Level: One of the following conformance levels of conformance must be met. [2220]" Suggested wording: 1.) Conformance Level: One of the following levels of conformance must be met. [2220] === Under 4.) Accessibility-Supported Technologies: "Any information or functionality that is implemented in technologies that are not accessibility supported must also be available ..." Suggested wording: Any information or functionality that is implemented via (or using) technologies that are not accessibility supported must also be available ... === "6.) Complete processes: If a Web page that is part of a process does not conform at some level, then no conformance is possible at that level for any Web pages in that process." Suggested wording: When a series of Web pages present sequential steps that need to be completed in order to accomplish a task (or an activity), conformance at a particular level may be claimed only if all Web pages in the series conform at that level. === Use of Bronze, Silver, Gold: I suppose usage of these terms has been debated at length. Yet it feels like one is aspiring for an Olympic medal! Personally I would be comfortable withLevel1, Level 2 and Level 3. (or Level-1 (Minimum), Level 2 (Medium) and Level 3 (high) Thanks, Sailesh Panchang www.deque.com Phone 571-344-1765 ____________________________________________________________________________________Ready for the edge of your seat? Check out tonight's top picks on Yahoo! TV. http://tv.yahoo.com/
Received on Wednesday, 29 August 2007 19:41:40 UTC