- From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
- Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 11:18:49 -0500
- To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
- Message-id: <003001c7e40e$f55bd5e0$a117a8c0@NC84301>
>From TEITAC (508) discussion. I think Sailesh's edit is a good editorial one to make. CHANGE "simultaneously visually evident", TO "simultaneously evident visually" ALSO another related (non Sailesh) change CHANGE "conveyed by color differences" TO "conveyed by difference in color" Does anyone think that is less clear or changes the meaning? Here is the context. CURRENT WORDING 1.4.1 Use of Color: Any information <http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/#informationbycolordef> that is conveyed by color differences is also simultaneously visually evident without the color differences PROPOSED NEW WORDING 1.4.1 Use of Color: Any information <http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/#informationbycolordef> that is conveyed by difference in color is also simultaneously evident visually without the color difference. Gregg -- ------------------------------ Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. _____ From: teitac-websoftware-bounces@list.teitac.org [mailto:teitac-websoftware-bounces@list.teitac.org] On Behalf Of Sailesh Panchang Sent: Monday, August 20, 2007 8:17 AM To: 'TEITAC Web/Software Subcommittee' Subject: Re: [teitac-websoftware] Color "Difference in color" between parts of content is the key. So I vote for the WCAG2 statement and Greg's reasoning if I may. That statement precisely conveys the evaluation criterion. In the WCAG2 statement I suggest a small editorial change: Instead of "simultaneously visually evident", I feel "simultaneously evident visually" reads better without loss of meaning. Sailesh Panchang Senior Accessibility Engineer Deque Systems Inc. (www.deque.com) 11130 Sunrise Valley Drive, Suite #140, Reston VA 20191 Phone: 703-225-0380 (ext 105) E-mail: sailesh.panchang@deque.com
Received on Tuesday, 21 August 2007 16:19:01 UTC