Re: Editorial Survey #1 is up

One problem is that the user may not be able to tell what site an "opaque"
URI is part of, hence how to find the site-specific search engine. So in the
naked URI scenario, it may be necessary to fall back on a generic search
engine.

Loretta

On 5/15/07, Bailey Bruce <Bailey@access-board.gov> wrote:
>
>
> I do not quite follow this logic behind this concern.  As the site owner
> -- the entity claiming conformance -- do you not have control over the
> search engine provided for your site?  Ensuring that *your* search
> engine *continues* to turn up your accessible versions would just be
> part of the requirements as your search engine behavior was revised.
> Why is this not something you could control?  Or control at least as
> well as other content that goes up *after* your initial conformance
> claim.
>
>

Received on Tuesday, 15 May 2007 15:00:27 UTC