- From: Loretta Guarino Reid <lorettaguarino@google.com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 10:04:57 -0700
- To: "Christophe Strobbe" <christophe.strobbe@esat.kuleuven.be>
- Cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
That seems like a compelling argument for making it a failure to add non-decorative content via CSS. Loretta On 4/20/07, Christophe Strobbe <christophe.strobbe@esat.kuleuven.be> wrote: > > Hi, > > In yesterday's telecon, there was a discussion about whether > CSS-generated content (especially if it is not purely decorative) > should be a failure or not. > In the section on "Generated content, automatic numbering, and lists" > of the current last call working draft of CSS 2.1, I found the > following statement: "Generated content does not alter the document > tree. In particular, it is not fed back to the document language > processor (e.g., for reparsing)." > (<http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-CSS21-20061106/generate.html#content>). > The current CSS 2 specification says the same thing > (<http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS2/generate.html#content>; just before section 12.3). > This seems to me an important difference with DOM scripts that add > content, and we should keep this in mind in future discussions. > > Best regards, > > Christophe > > > -- > Christophe Strobbe > K.U.Leuven - Departement of Electrical Engineering - Research Group > on Document Architectures > Kasteelpark Arenberg 10 - 3001 Leuven-Heverlee - BELGIUM > tel: +32 16 32 85 51 > http://www.docarch.be/ > > > Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm > > >
Received on Friday, 20 April 2007 17:05:23 UTC