- From: ~:'' ありがとうございました。 <j.chetwynd@btinternet.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 11:27:56 +0100
- To: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Lisa's rectification whilst thoroughly concurring with Lisa's rectification of the text, it does appear lengthy and circuitous. It's quite evident that WCAG1 and WCAG2 largely ignore the needs of this large group, when compared with the provision for physical, visual or equipment assistance. A simple short sentence to this effect would better meet their needs, and provide ready evidence of intent. Unfortunately the fact that W3C technical specifications continue to be created without reference to their needs, means that significant errata are now having to be retrospectively incorporated. Currently this is being enactioned* outside either the WAI, WCAG or P&F WGs which is regrettable, and no doubt leading to further delays. regards Jonathan Chetwynd "The rectification movement consists mainly of summing up and criticism and self-criticism." * http://www.reference.com/browse/wiki/Enaction On 10 Apr 2007, at 14:49, lisa wrote: to: Although some of the accessibility issues of people with cognitive, language, and learning disabilities are addressed by WCAG 2.0, either directly or through assistive technologies, the WCAG 2.0 guidelines do not address many areas of need for people with these disabilities. There is a need for more research and development in this important area by the working group and additional success criteria and techniques may be added to future versions of this document.
Received on Wednesday, 11 April 2007 10:28:14 UTC