- From: Bailey, Bruce <Bruce.Bailey@ed.gov>
- Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 09:18:09 -0500
- To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Cc: "Gregg Vanderheiden" <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
Received on Thursday, 7 December 2006 14:19:01 UTC
Is there specific verbiage similar to what 508 has for equivalent facilitation? > So we can't have a CC-9 that is advisory. Okay, so how about: <q> CC-Gold, Above and Beyond: Content that conforms to advisory techniques or other best practices. </q> > 2 Non-conforming Content: It is recommended that even non-conforming content conform to the extent that it can. That is nice too, but it is not the problem I am highlighting. I am suggesting a way for content owners to claim credit for going beyond what is recommended for A/AA/AAA. I brought up the example of robust Lynx compatibility. Other examples would include providing primary information via video sign language or writing at a second grade level.
Received on Thursday, 7 December 2006 14:19:01 UTC