- From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
- Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 16:19:57 -0600
- To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <004a01c6fe03$dd3eb870$8c17a8c0@NC84301>
Below are some of the proposals coming out of the Face to Face meeting These are not yet consensus decisions but are being explored toward that end by the working group. Some of these are re-affirmations to be sure there is consensus. Additional information and proposals will follow on some topics. Comments welcome minutes <http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2006/10/25-27_ftf-minutes> of the Face to Face Meeting. Font scaling Proposal on font scaling issues: 1. if we can find proper wording, there should be at least one SC dealing with font scaling 2. If we can find proper wording, there should be a SC at least at Level 3 that deals with scaling and reflow (font and other?) 3. Investigate drafting a SC that talks about not interfering with the font-related accessibility features of UAs Testability Proposal on testability requirement: If it's a SC to which you must conform, it must be testable. General applicability Proposal on general applicability requirement: Everything at L1 or L2 can be applied to all web content. Seizure disorders Proposal for change in approach on seizure disorders: Explore recasting the pixel measurements about region on a screen that can trigger photosensitive epilepsy seizures into "angle of view". How to Meet describes how to calculate, and sufficient techniques provide pixel measurements for common use cases (e.g., standard monitor at standard viewing distance). Author must make assumptions about user environment, SC 1.3.4 (Text variations) Proposal on SC 1.3.4: SC 1.3.4 should be folded into SC 1.3.1, with text descriptions provided as a fallback technique when a technology does not provide a mechanism to describe a relationship. Baseline Proposal on baseline issues: Proceed with developing a hybrid baseline approach that includes rules for using technologies and sufficient techniques for conformance. GL 4.2 Proposal on Guideline 4.2 issues: 1. Move handling of alternate versions from 4.2.1 and 4.2.3 to conformance (there is a logic flaw by keeping 4.2.1 and 4.2.3 in as success criteria; content that is suppose to pass 4.2.1 and 4.2.3 would fail all or some of the other success criteria) 2. keep 4.2.2 and 4.2.4 as success criteria Level AAA Conformance Proposal on Level AAA issues: 1. AAA conformance means all applicable level 3 success criteria are met 2. Those making conformance claims can report progress towards higher level if they specify particular success criteria they have met. 3. No A+ or AA+ claim languages, only A or AA etc. User-contributed content Proposal on user-contributed content: 1. Definition of User-contributed content: * content from a person/entity who is not compensated for the content that is included automatically in web content and where the content is not edited except for censorship 2. Provide an exception for user-contributed content from conformance claim if author constrains user-contributed content to plain text, or provides means for user to submit conforming content Aggregated content We are defining what accessibility means. We want to do it in a way that is usable by legal entities so that they don't go make up their own - but we don't need to get into their territory any more than is a natural part of ours. Proposal for aggregated content: 1. Conformance claims only by Primary Resource (Web Page/unit) We discussed allowing "subclaims" and inheritance of those claims. In the end we decided to remove inheritance implication. We did think providers of content should document what did or did not meet conformance to help aggregators. Web unit vs web page Proposed consensus on web unit/page terminology: Use "web page" unless we can't make it work Gregg ------------------------ Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. Professor - Depts of Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr. Director - Trace R & D Center University of Wisconsin-Madison < <http://trace.wisc.edu/> http://trace.wisc.edu/> FAX 608/262-8848 DSS Player at http://tinyurl.com/dho6b <http://trace.wisc.edu:8080/mailman/listinfo/>
Received on Wednesday, 1 November 2006 22:21:29 UTC